2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
115
2
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
18
115
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that KNO 3 did not act as a purely inert electrolyte in the adsorption system, since increasing the initial concentration of KNO 3 led to a decrease in the final pH of the solution; however, the fluctuation of the final pH with the KNO 3 concentration was quite small. This phenomenon may be explained in terms of specific cation adsorption onto the adsorbent surface (Smiciklas et al 2008). Similar results have been reported byŠljivić et al…”
Section: Effect Of Phsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that KNO 3 did not act as a purely inert electrolyte in the adsorption system, since increasing the initial concentration of KNO 3 led to a decrease in the final pH of the solution; however, the fluctuation of the final pH with the KNO 3 concentration was quite small. This phenomenon may be explained in terms of specific cation adsorption onto the adsorbent surface (Smiciklas et al 2008). Similar results have been reported byŠljivić et al…”
Section: Effect Of Phsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were carried out on a TTRIII (Japan) instrument employing Cu Kα Ni-filtered radiation. Points of zero charge (pH PZC ) were determined via a batch equilibration technique (Smiciklas et al 2000).…”
Section: Analysis Of Adsorbent Characteristics and Determination Of Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Such release of protons accompanied with cation sorption is a positive sign of specific cation sorption mechanism [33,34]. The differences between pH PZC and equilibrium pH were in the range 1.50-2.87 pH units, for variously treated bone sorbents.…”
Section: Sorption Of CD 2?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…concentration [33], and the same sorbent and various concentrations of Cd 2? [34]. Analysis of the equilibrium concentrations of Ca 2?…”
Section: Sorption Of CD 2?mentioning
confidence: 99%