2001
DOI: 10.2202/0027-6014.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing the Program Choice of Doctoral Students in Higher Education Administration

Abstract: This study examines the program choice of doctoral students in higher education administration. The authors used The Program Choice Questionnaire in a nationwide random sample of enrolled doctoral students. Results indicate influential factors vary according to gender, enrollment status, age, and race. Implications and recommendations are offered as they relate to enrollment management, admission, and recruitment in graduate education.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this research was to examine factors that influence students' decisions regarding enrollment in graduate-level counseling programs, with specific attention to students' knowledge of CACREP accreditation prior to and following enrollment. The findings of this study were congruent with previous research, indicating that counseling students deemed program location to be the most influential factor in their enrollment decision-making process (Poock & Love, 2001). A dearth of previous research existed on the role of program accreditation in enrollment decisions; the current study suggests that program accreditation status signifies the second most influential factor, reported by 14% of the participants surveyed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of this research was to examine factors that influence students' decisions regarding enrollment in graduate-level counseling programs, with specific attention to students' knowledge of CACREP accreditation prior to and following enrollment. The findings of this study were congruent with previous research, indicating that counseling students deemed program location to be the most influential factor in their enrollment decision-making process (Poock & Love, 2001). A dearth of previous research existed on the role of program accreditation in enrollment decisions; the current study suggests that program accreditation status signifies the second most influential factor, reported by 14% of the participants surveyed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Within a non-field-specific survey of 2,834 admitted graduate students, Kallio (1995) found the following factors to be most influential in participants' program selection and enrollment decisions: (a) residency status, (b) quality and other academic environment characteristics, (c) work-related concerns, (d) spouse considerations, (e) financial aid, and (f) campus social environment. A more recent examination of doctorallevel students within higher education administration programs (Poock & Love, 2001) indicated similar influential factors with location, flexibility of accommodations for work-school-life balance, reputation and friendliness of faculty of highest importance. Flexibility of program requirements and delivery format also were indicated.…”
Section: Graduate Program Enrollment Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The survey items (including categories and factors) were developed based on a review of previous questionnaires (Austin 1988; Gagnon & Cocolas 1988;Neice & Braun 1977;Olson 1992;Poock & Love 2001;Webb 1993;Zikopoulos & Barber 1986). The survey questionnaire High Educ (2007) 54:759-780 761 followed the three-stage temporal flow of the synthesis model and the study abroad decision-choice of country, choice of institution/program, and future plans.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers (Boyle & Boice, 1998;Golde, 2000;Poock & Love, 2001) have found that participating in orientation activities reduces graduate students' anxiety and increases persistence and retention among graduate students (Issac, 1993;Washburn, 2002). In addition, graduate students engage in socialization processes that begin to initiate them into the culture of their academic disciplines and the practices associated with their budding professional identities (Weidman, Twale, & Stein, 2001).…”
Section: The Need For a Multicultural-focused Orientation Graduate Stmentioning
confidence: 99%