2002
DOI: 10.1029/2002gl016232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the island‐mass effect of the Galápagos Archipelago

Abstract: [1] Enhanced phytoplankton biomass in the wake of the Galápagos Islands is thought to result from an island-mass effect (IME) fueled by upwelling of the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) and by natural iron enrichment from the island platform. Annual means of five variables describing the thermocline, the pycnocline, and the availability of nitrate at the surface were derived from the World Ocean Atlas 1998 (WOA98). The first principal component of these variables explained 55.8% of the variance, corroborating tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(29 reference statements)
3
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in biological productivity in the surrounding islands has been reported in several studies as a consequence of the island mass effect (Doty and Oguri, 1956;Palacios, 2002). Patterns of plankton biomass accumulation or productivity increase near the FNA have been frequently described (Lira et al, 2014;Tchamabi et al, 2017) and related as a consequence of the island effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in biological productivity in the surrounding islands has been reported in several studies as a consequence of the island mass effect (Doty and Oguri, 1956;Palacios, 2002). Patterns of plankton biomass accumulation or productivity increase near the FNA have been frequently described (Lira et al, 2014;Tchamabi et al, 2017) and related as a consequence of the island effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These currents create a number of hydrogeographic regions within the islands that vary in temperature and productivity (see Glynn & Wellington 1983 for more details). Regions are separated by <150 km, but regional differences in sea surface temperature (SST) may exceed 5°C and productivity may vary 10-fold among regions (Wellington et al 2001, Palacios 2002, Ruttenberg et al 2005b. Over the scale of the entire archipelago, we divide the islands into 3 regions based on the largest differences in SST: (1) North, where temperatures are warmest, (2) West, where temperatures are coldest, and (3) Central/South (hereafter referred to as Central), where temperatures were generally intermediate between the North and West (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promine nt to]Xlg raphic features in the ocean, such as island s and seamounts, are oft en associated with hi gher levels of biolog ical produ cti vity and di versit y than ope n wat ers (Pal acios 2002;Genin 20Cl4). Oceani c islands are res ponsible for the deve lopment of locali zed upwellings, eddies and conve rgence zo nes, which in tum may cause e nhanced primary producti vities and promote biomass accumulation at specific sites (Calde ira et al 2002;Palacios 2002). In addition, the islands may act as a barri er to the hori zontal dispersal of zooplankton and larval/ju ve nile fi sh that tends to become entrap ped in their vic init y (Palacios 2002), thereby increasing feeding opportunities for predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%