Factors Influencing the Formalization of Rural Land Transactions in Ethiopia: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach

Abstract

Despite the recent successful establishment of systematic land registration programs in some African countries including Ethiopia, updating the land registers has become a growing concern. However, there is limited empirical evidence about whether landholders’ behavior is driving the lack of updating land registers in Ethiopia. Using the theory of planned behavior, this study examines the factors that influence landholders’ behavior of formalizing rural land transactions in Ethiopia. Primary and secondary data were collected using surveys, key informant interviews, and a literature review. A total of 206 respondents participated in the survey from the Basona Worena district of the Amhara region, central Ethiopia. A structural equation model and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey data and supplemented by qualitative findings. The study findings revealed that landholders’ attitudes and subjective norms have positively and significantly influenced their intentions to formalize land transactions. However, perceived behavioral control has a negative and insignificant influence. The predictive relevance of the research model is significant and indicates strong intentions to formalize but less actual behavior. This behavior can influence the currency of the information in the land register in the near future and degrade the functions and sustainability of the land registration system in Ethiopia. The study findings recommended facilitating the behavioral changes of landholders to transform their strong intentions into actual practice. Policymakers should develop and implement an innovative information value creation strategy including landholder-oriented services that incentivize the formalization of land transactions and helps landholders overcome hurdles created by subjective norms.

Overcoming inertia for sustainable urban development: Understanding the role of stimuli in shaping residents' participation behaviors in neighborhood regeneration projects in China

“…The model utilized in this study encompassed 5 latent variables and 17 observable indicators associated with these variables. Following the approach employed by Abab et al (2022), the minimum required sample size of 150 was calculated using the Soper online free statistical calculator. The estimated parameters and values are presented in Table 4.…”

The Effect of Land Tenure Institutional Factors on Small Landholders’ Sustainable Land Management Investment: Evidence from the Highlands of Ethiopia

“…In a formal system or statutory context, land titling is sought as one of the mechanisms that provide rights holders with a secure tenure right and incentivizes them to use land efficiently by investing in land conservation and improvement [5,18]. Since early 2000, the government of Ethiopia has launched one of the biggest two-stage land registration and certification programs in Africa with the aim to improve land tenure security in the highlands of Ethiopia and incentivize long-term land-based investment such as SLM practices and curb land degradation [31].…”

The Effect of Policy and Technological Innovations of Land Tenure on Small Landholders’ Credit-Worthiness: Evidence from Ethiopia

“…Notwithstanding this, since 2020, access to information by the rightsholders about their legal rights from woreda digital land registers has improved when the need arises to process credit applications. Abab et al [23] found that all mortgages or credit transactions had been registered in the digital land registers in Basona worena woreda of Ethiopia, where the system has been up and running since 2019. Results from the digital land registers of the current study show that the total number of households who received SLLC-linked credits was 10,789 with a credit value of 8 million US dollars equivalent, although only 3% of smallholder households obtained this volume of credit in the study kebeles.…”

“…Historically, the FLLC started around the end of the 1990s and ran through 2010. In contrast, the SLLC pilots have been started since 2003 and run through 2013 [23]. Since 2014, the SLLC rollout program has been launched nationwide and continued expanding in the highland parts of the country to date [24].…”

“…Since 2014, the SLLC rollout program has been launched nationwide and continued expanding in the highland parts of the country to date [24]. An existing study shows that over 25 million rural land parcels were demarcated, mapped, and issued with an SLLC as of 2022 [23]. Existing studies well documented the effects of this largescale and cost-effective land certification program on tenure security [25], agriculture productivity [26], women empowerment [18], land rental market participation [27,28], and land disputes [29].…”