2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijmlo.2010.029953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing teachers' adoption of a ubiquitous technology application in supporting teacher performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of usability-related issues mentioned by these students in the focus groups were quite similar to what is already revealed in the literature, including smaller screen size, rapid battery consumption, smaller memory and storage capabilities, difficulty of attaching large files, not being able to perform tasks requiring heavy processing, some tasks taking more time and more steps, smaller keypad and at times compromised mobile internet speed (Chen, Chen, Hwang, & Yang, 2010;Kiili, 2002;Kukulska-Hulme, 2005;Uther, 2002;Wei, Zhuo, & Zhang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussion and Findingssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of usability-related issues mentioned by these students in the focus groups were quite similar to what is already revealed in the literature, including smaller screen size, rapid battery consumption, smaller memory and storage capabilities, difficulty of attaching large files, not being able to perform tasks requiring heavy processing, some tasks taking more time and more steps, smaller keypad and at times compromised mobile internet speed (Chen, Chen, Hwang, & Yang, 2010;Kiili, 2002;Kukulska-Hulme, 2005;Uther, 2002;Wei, Zhuo, & Zhang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussion and Findingssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…To summarize common usability issues discussed by the participants of the focus groups, the usability tree in Figure 1 shows the usability node and associated child nodes as outcome from the analysis of the focus groups' interview sessions with Pakistani university students. It is important to note that these are also some of the common usability issues found in mobile learning literature (Chen, et al, 2010;Churchill & Hedberg, 2008;Daniel Su Kuen, 2006;Kukulska-Hulme, 2005). Results of this study confirmed what has been reported in literature in terms of common mobile device usability issues for learning purposes.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Students can learn wherever they are [3] [10]. Mobile learning perspective can be classified into four, they are techno-centric, e-learning focus, formal education instrument and student-centered learning [11][12] [13]. Nowadays, technology empowerment at schools is used to ensure the implementation of effective learning with new opportunities and to encourage better learning performance [7][9] [10].…”
Section: Definition Of Mobile Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This learning can be done anywhere by students whenever they have the available mobile technology [6], [7]. The perspectives of mobile technology can be grouped into four those are: techno-centric, focus on e-learning, formal education components, and student-centered learning [3], [4], [8], [9]. Nowadays, the emphasis on technology at school is to ensure the effective learning implementation with new opportunities and to drive better learning performances [5], [7], [10].…”
Section: A Mobile Learning Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%