2002
DOI: 10.1006/ecss.2001.0873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing Suspended Sediment Flux in the Upper Gulf of California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat and salt budgets suggest that the gravity currents play an important role in the flushing of the UGC. Although the largest resuspension of sediments in the UGC occur during spring tides, significant near-bottom suspended sediment fluxes out of the UGC occur only during neap tides, driven by the gravity currents (Alvarez and Jones, 2002).…”
Section: The Upper Gulf Of Californiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat and salt budgets suggest that the gravity currents play an important role in the flushing of the UGC. Although the largest resuspension of sediments in the UGC occur during spring tides, significant near-bottom suspended sediment fluxes out of the UGC occur only during neap tides, driven by the gravity currents (Alvarez and Jones, 2002).…”
Section: The Upper Gulf Of Californiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictions are derived by empirically relating device output (typically acoustic signal-to-noise ratio or return signal amplitude in counts or decibels) and the SSC of the water [37][38][39][40][41][42]. When an acoustic instrument is calibrated for a water system in which suspended sediment properties display little time dependence, no additional sensor is needed to measure the SSC.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have investigated the performance of acoustic Doppler current profilers for the prediction of SSC in various water environments, including coastal environments and rivers [32][33][34][35][36]. Predictions are derived by empirically relating device output (typically acoustic signal-to-noise ratio or return signal amplitude in counts or decibels) and the SSC of the water [37][38][39][40][41][42]. When an acoustic instrument is calibrated for a water system in which suspended sediment properties display little time dependence, no additional sensor is needed to measure the SSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical Backscatter Sensor-OBS) y acústicos (e.g. Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler-ADCP) para estimar la CSS (Holdaway et al, 1999;Alvarez & Jones, 2001;Tattersall et al, 2003;Kostaschuk et al, 2005;Dinehart & Burau, 2005;Fettweis et al, 2006;Merckelbach & Ridderinkhof, 2006). El OBS es un sensor óptico que mide turbidez y CSS, detectando la radiación infrarroja retrodispersada por las partículas en suspensión (Creed et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified