2006
DOI: 10.1159/000094644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children following Early Cochlear Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
62
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Developmental studies in animals and humans indicate that there are critical/sensitive periods during which the developing central nervous system can most readily use sensory information in order to form linguistic structure [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Insufficient auditory stimulation during these critical periods of a child's development will most likely lead to linguistic and communicative deficits [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental studies in animals and humans indicate that there are critical/sensitive periods during which the developing central nervous system can most readily use sensory information in order to form linguistic structure [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Insufficient auditory stimulation during these critical periods of a child's development will most likely lead to linguistic and communicative deficits [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature reports improved speech perception as well as sound localization in children with bilateral CIs (BiCIs) compared to listening with a unilateral CI [4]. A study by Van Deun et al [5] showed that localization abilities in children with BiCIs implanted sequentially correlated significantly with parent-proxy questionnaire data on the Speech, Spatial and Objective: The purpose of this study was (1) to measure parental expectations before surgery of a sequentially placed second cochlear implant and compare these results with parental observations postoperatively and (2) to measure device use of the second cochlear implant and compare to unilateral implant use. Methods: Thirty prelingually deaf children with a unilateral cochlear implant (mean age at first implant 1.8 years) received a second implant at a mean age of 5.3 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…During this time, several developments in implant design and stimulation paradigms have been developed and age at implantation decreased. These changes have led to better results [1] and subsequently higher expectations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, age at implantation has been found to influence the auditory performance in profoundly deaf children significantly [26] and thus the development of their speech perception and intelligibility [5][6][7][8]. However, it should be highlighted that there is still a wide variation in individual outcomes [8], and exact contributing factors for this phenomenon have yet to be determined [27].…”
Section: Age At Implantation As a Critical Parameter Of Cochlear Implmentioning
confidence: 99%