2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
322
4
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
17
322
4
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported above from the studies of near and square conducted by Hay et al (2006b) and by Warren et al (2007) are part of a growing body of research that shows that social characteristics associated with speakers can affect the interpretation of phonetic information. In some of the early perceptual work in this area, Strand and Johnson (1996) found that participants' categorization of fricatives on a [ʃ]-[s] continuum was influenced by the putative sex of the speaker as indicated by video clips with which the audio signals were aligned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reported above from the studies of near and square conducted by Hay et al (2006b) and by Warren et al (2007) are part of a growing body of research that shows that social characteristics associated with speakers can affect the interpretation of phonetic information. In some of the early perceptual work in this area, Strand and Johnson (1996) found that participants' categorization of fricatives on a [ʃ]-[s] continuum was influenced by the putative sex of the speaker as indicated by video clips with which the audio signals were aligned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This was demonstrated in a study employing four voices (two of each sex) that were independently rated for probable speaker age. In another study Hay et al (2006b) manipulated age through photographs and showed that perceived age of the speaker influenced identification accuracy of near and square word pairs. The photographs were presented as though they were pictures of the speakers being listened to, and accuracy was greatest after photographs of older individuals, even though the same male and female speech tokens were presented after each of the male and female photographs respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monophthongal stimuli were words taken from the lexical sets KIT, DRESS, TRAP, BARN, STRUT, and THOUGHT. In addition to the target monophthongs, participants were also presented with diphthongs involved in the NEAR/SQUARE merger in New Zealand English (Hay, Warren, & Drager 2006). Only (2009) the results from the monophthongs are presented in this paper.…”
Section: Speech Production Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some effects are to a greater or lesser degree indirect. Thus the rate of speech implied by just a single long or short vowel can influence decisions about the identity of an immediately preceding consonant (Miller and Liberman, 1979), a photograph of a person can suffice to cue the relevant talker characteristics (Hay, Warren and Drager, 2006), and exposure to a dialect label can bias the recall of the nature of a vowel sound (Hay, Nolan and Drager, 2006). Combined use of very different information sources -acoustics of the signal, stored knowledge in the lexicon or general knowledge in memory, abstract labels and prior episodes of cognitive or sensory processing -in an integrated fashion is however no problem for a system such as that proposed by the Merge model.…”
Section: Categorical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%