Factors influencing self‐management in patients with type 2 diabetes: a quantitative systematic review protocol

Bagnasco, Annamaria; Giacomo, Patrizia Di; Mora, Roberta Da Rin Della; Catania, Gianluca; Turci, Carlo; Rocco, Gennaro; Sasso, Loredana

doi:10.1111/jan.12178

Cited by 37 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 127 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many complications of T2DM can be under controlled when rigorous diabetes self‐management activities are regularly performed (Bagnasco et al . ). However, it is not easy for T2DM patients to implement self‐management on a daily basis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…It was reported that patients with diabetes do not have optimal glycaemic control; in 2006, only 26Á8% of the T2DM patients had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) lower than 6Á5% (Pan et al 2009). Many complications of T2DM can be under controlled when rigorous diabetes self-management activities are regularly performed (Bagnasco et al 2014). However, it is not easy for T2DM patients to implement self-management on a daily basis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Theory‐based self‐management educational interventions on patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Zhao

Suhonen

Koskinen

et al. 2016

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theory‐based self‐management educational interventions on patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Zhao

Suhonen

Koskinen

et al. 2016

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To manage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), people need tailored information from diabetes specialist nurses, as well as sufficient information processing skills associated with health literacy (HL) (see e.g., Bagnasco et al, 2014;Bohanny et al, 2013). Considering people's HL as a mediator for effective communication with healthcare professionals (Ishikawa & Kiuchi, 2010;Rudd, Rosenfeld, & Simonds, 2012), it becomes clear that low HL is a barrier to optimal management of T2DM (Bohanny et al, 2013;Schillinger et al, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validating the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in people with type 2 diabetes: Latent trait analyses applying multidimensional Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis

Finbråten

Pettersen

Wilde‐Larsson

et al. 2017

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To validate the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS‐EU‐Q47) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Background The HLS‐EU‐Q47 latent variable is outlined in a framework with four cognitive domains integrated in three health domains, implying 12 theoretically defined subscales. Valid and reliable health literacy measurers are crucial to effectively adapt health communication and education to individuals and groups of patients. Design Cross‐sectional study applying confirmatory latent trait analyses. Methods Using a paper‐and‐pencil self‐administered approach, 388 adults responded in March 2015. The data were analysed using the Rasch methodology and confirmatory factor analysis. Results Response violation (response dependency) and trait violation (multidimensionality) of local independence were identified. Fitting the “multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit” model, 1‐, 3‐ and 12‐dimensional Rasch models were applied and compared. Poor model fit and differential item functioning were present in some items, and several subscales suffered from poor targeting and low reliability. Despite multidimensional data, we did not observe any unordered response categories. Conclusion Interpreting the domains as distinct but related latent dimensions, the data fit a 12‐dimensional Rasch model and a 12‐factor confirmatory factor model best. Therefore, the analyses did not support the estimation of one overall “health literacy score.” To support the plausibility of claims based on the HLS‐EU score(s), we suggest: removing the health care aspect to reduce the magnitude of multidimensionality; rejecting redundant items to avoid response dependency; adding “harder” items and applying a six‐point rating scale to improve subscale targeting and reliability; and revising items to improve model fit and avoid bias owing to person factors.

show abstract

“…Self-management has been universally defined as a person's ability to manage treatment, symptoms and dramatic lifestyle changes (Bagnasco et al, 2013). In the context of T2DM, the management of one's chronic disorder plays a significant role requiring patient-driven actions (Yamashita et al, 2011).…”

Section: Behavioural and Psychological Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What factors can affect the management of diabetes with regard to studying at university? A systematic review

2018

Fields: Journal of Huddersfield Student Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this review is to identify and synthesise literature about diabetes management, and specifically, the barriers that may affect university students' Type 2 diabetes management. A systematic literature search was conducted using five databases: CINAHL, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, PubMed and Summon. Eligible articles from January 2010 to February 2017 were included in the review. Articles identified by the search which met the inclusion criteria were screened prior to selection for synthesis. A total of 2,577 articles were screened, of which 72 were fully assessed for synthesis. Of these, 22 met the inclusion criteria as they provided useful insights into the issue and were deemed relevant to enable the research question to be answered. These were included in the review.This review found that individual and external characteristics play a significant role in diabetes management. Additionally, external stressors from university can lead to patients' non-adherence to medication regimens. The comprehensive review of the evidence in the current body of literature illustrates that a range of factors may affect university students' management of their Type 2 diabetes. Thus, it provides information that may inform how university well-being teams and policymakers support university students with Type 2 diabetes. Despite attempts being made to undertake a comprehensive search, certain aspects restricted this, such as there being only a single researcher. Nevertheless, this review is important as it identifies a gap in knowledge about Type 2 diabetes management among the university student population. Importantly, this research found that there is a need for more empirical work to be undertaken within the university population to examine external stressors that may affect students' diabetes management.

show abstract

Factors influencing self‐management in patients with type 2 diabetes: a quantitative systematic review protocol

Cited by 37 publications

References 127 publications

Theory‐based self‐management educational interventions on patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Theory‐based self‐management educational interventions on patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Validating the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in people with type 2 diabetes: Latent trait analyses applying multidimensional Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis

What factors can affect the management of diabetes with regard to studying at university? A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About