2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing safety and efficacy of intravenous iron-carbohydrate nanomedicines: From production to clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to select characterization methods more specifically, and to standardize and optimize established animal models to be easier to construct and more similar to human physiological conditions. In addition, factors that affect the safety and stability of hydrogels and osteogenic synthesis factors throughout the production, storage, transportation, treatment, and clinical application of hydrogels should be considered for better clinical application [ 138 ].…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to select characterization methods more specifically, and to standardize and optimize established animal models to be easier to construct and more similar to human physiological conditions. In addition, factors that affect the safety and stability of hydrogels and osteogenic synthesis factors throughout the production, storage, transportation, treatment, and clinical application of hydrogels should be considered for better clinical application [ 138 ].…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single dose of intravenous iron may be sufficient to optimize the martial status in fragile individuals, such as older adults who are scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery, whereas oral supplements may require daily administrations for weeks [ 99 ]. Diverse intravenous iron formulas are available, with differences in unit size, nature of the carbohydrate shell (e.g., dextran, sucrose, gluconate, maltose, sorbitol), surface charge, iron form (Fe 2+ or Fe 3+ ) and content [ 106 ]. The dose of iron to be administered through parenteral routes can be calculated based on body weight and Hb levels [ 107 ], whereas the personalization of oral therapy is often missing, probably due to the perception that the vein infusion is riskier.…”
Section: The Present Of Iron Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this widespread mistrust, most of the formulations are safe and supported by a positive benefit-risk ratio when using tailored dosing and monitoring [ 109 , 110 ], and appears to be more indicated than oral preparations also in conditions of gastrointestinal inflammation or when compliance to oral therapy is dubious. Nevertheless, the diversities in the costs for production, transport, storage, handling (e.g., dilution, contamination risk, in-use stability), and health care assistance render the intravenous preparations not usually considered the first choice of treatment [ 106 , 111 ].…”
Section: The Present Of Iron Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are spheroidal iron-carbohydrate nanoparticles, ranging in size from 8 to 30 nm. 3,6 Each particle consists of a central core of iron oxyhydroxide gel and a shell of carbohydrate. The carbohydrate maintains the stability of the iron and slows its release, preventing toxic reactions.…”
Section: Intravenous Iron Preparations: Similar Yet Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%