2012
DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.9.898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing medical institution selection for outpatient services

Abstract: T his study analyzes determinants of patients' choice of healthcare providers in outpatient services and identifies their effects. Data were collected from two waves of the Korean Health Panel. The unit of analysis was an outpatient visit (n=189,739). Various types of medical institutions were grouped into general hospitals (including tertiary hospitals), hospitals, and clinics. A multinomial logit model was used to examine the determinants of medical institution selection. Clinics were the most frequent (82.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted relative change rate also decreased more in patients receiving TCAs with a CCI of 0 and in patients from rural areas and clinics, which means that TCA prescription decreased more than that in the other groups, despite considering the fact that the higher the frequency of TCA prescription, the more it decreases. Patients with a severe disease usually choose high-end hospitals in larger cities [ 26 , 27 ], whereas those with a mild disease tend to be treated more in rural areas and clinics. Medication changes are relatively easy for low-risk patients because of a wide range of drug choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted relative change rate also decreased more in patients receiving TCAs with a CCI of 0 and in patients from rural areas and clinics, which means that TCA prescription decreased more than that in the other groups, despite considering the fact that the higher the frequency of TCA prescription, the more it decreases. Patients with a severe disease usually choose high-end hospitals in larger cities [ 26 , 27 ], whereas those with a mild disease tend to be treated more in rural areas and clinics. Medication changes are relatively easy for low-risk patients because of a wide range of drug choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be several reasons for this result. According to a recent report in Korea, 38 the factors that were associated with the upper-level institutions are males, beneficiaries of Medical Aid, education level, household income, and severe diseases; the last three factors were negatively associated with the level of health status. Thus, we speculated that our results were favorable for the private clinic regarding adherence because of the following factors: there are differences in the utilization patterns for a private clinic compared with a general hospital regarding the availability of the out-patient department clinic schedule for unexpected schedule changes or extra sessions, the type of additional psychosocial programs in the clinic are different, and the severity of the disease is different; however, these factors were not directly assessed in the current study” if the edit maintains the intended meaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Korea, health care users can freely choose health care institutions regardless of its type for outpatient visits, and economic factors (since treatment at hospitals is more expensive), distance, and time affect selection of health care institution [43][44][45][46]. Andersen's health care utilization model considers these as enabling factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%