2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing flood risk mitigation after wildfire: Insights for individual and collective action after the 2010 Schultz Fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from that, the embung development program was also discussed as an effort to improve agriculture in fire-prone areas. This is in line with Burnett's research on flood risk mitigation after wildfire (Burnett & Edgeley, 2023).…”
Section: Government Entrepreneurs Ngos and Communities Interventionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Apart from that, the embung development program was also discussed as an effort to improve agriculture in fire-prone areas. This is in line with Burnett's research on flood risk mitigation after wildfire (Burnett & Edgeley, 2023).…”
Section: Government Entrepreneurs Ngos and Communities Interventionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, there is a benefit to waiting for 3-5 years after a fire to understand the full costs of a single event. Additionally, by surveying affected residents a second time and after a decade, it was clear that household costs associated with the Schultz Fire continued to occur; additional analysis of survey data indicates that those engaged in collective action to address flood risk might have higher expenditures (Burnett and Edgeley 2023). Costs associated with household repairs and fire preparation continued to accumulate a decade later, though at a decreasing rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts found that the novelty of destructive fire more readily produced policy and behavioural change in landscapes where fire was infrequent compared with landscapes where fire was commonplace (Cohn et al 2008;Mockrin et al 2018). Few studies explore resident engagement in mitigation following cascading hazards such as low air quality caused by smoke and post-fire flooding, although initial research into the latter suggests connectivity between individual and collective actions can be leveraged to increase engagement (Burnett and Edgeley 2023). Institutional roles in resident mitigation have been increasingly documented, including the influence of real estate and planning professionals on resident risk perceptions, the presence and absence of homeowners' associations or other community organisational structures like Firewise committees and WUI groups, and use of ordinances or regulations (Steelman 2008;Collins 2008a;Bihari et al 2012;Steffey et al 2020).…”
Section: Resident Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has shifted to explore adaptation efforts that emerge during the recovery process. These include exploration of land use planning and development policies as a tool for post-fire adaptation, which uncovered significant variation in support and perceived feasibility among Southwestern study fires (Mockrin et al 2018(Mockrin et al , 2020, and examination of property-level efforts to address post-fire flood risk that found connections between engagement in individual and collective actions (Burnett and Edgeley 2023). Many recent impactful, record-breaking Southwestern wildfires have received little attention in the social science literature.…”
Section: Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%