Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511606397.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing fission–fusion grouping in chimpanzees in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
110
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
110
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, they exhibit a pattern of fission and fusion [18] in which members associate in temporary subgroups (parties), whose composition may last from minutes to days, and individuals can spend some time alone [7,19,20]. Party size is strongly influenced by the distribution and abundance of food, with larger parties forming during seasons or periods of high fruit abundance, or when fruit patches are aggregated [7,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. Other influences include the presence of sexually receptive females, which increases the number of adult males and sometimes females in parties [7,[25][26][27], and predation risk from leopards [28].…”
Section: Chimpanzee Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they exhibit a pattern of fission and fusion [18] in which members associate in temporary subgroups (parties), whose composition may last from minutes to days, and individuals can spend some time alone [7,19,20]. Party size is strongly influenced by the distribution and abundance of food, with larger parties forming during seasons or periods of high fruit abundance, or when fruit patches are aggregated [7,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. Other influences include the presence of sexually receptive females, which increases the number of adult males and sometimes females in parties [7,[25][26][27], and predation risk from leopards [28].…”
Section: Chimpanzee Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured food availability monthly via 7 phenological transects of 4 km each (666 individual trees and 44 food species) in the focal community's territory (Anderson et al 2002;Boesch et al 2006). We collected the following information for each transect: presence or absence of fruits, color of fruits, presence or absence of ripe fruits, location of fruits (in tress or on the ground), presence or absence of food remains, and an estimate of number of fruit per cubic meter in the canopy.…”
Section: Phenological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expressed the quantity of fruits available as the biomass abundance index (BA; Savini et al 2008), which is a combination of the food availability index (FAI; Anderson et al 2002) and the biomass per cubic meter of canopy (b). FAI is obtained from density (D), basal area of the trunk (B), and the proportion (P) of plants with available fruits during our visit.…”
Section: Food Availability and Fruit Seasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T ool use among modern wild ape populations, first reported in the early 19th century (1), has been documented throughout tropical Africa, and chimpanzees from West Africa are known for their use of stone tools for nut cracking (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). In 2002, the publication of recent buried remains of unintentionally fractured stone left behind by modern chimpanzees from Côte d'Ivoire outlined the potential of using archaeological methods in cultural primatological research and also identified the type of material assemblage that would allow archaeologists to detect and characterize ancient chimpanzee nut-cracking behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%