Aspects of Praematurity and Dysmaturity 1968
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3428-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing Fetal Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
1

Year Published

1969
1969
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean time of delivery was 39.4 + 1.1 (SD) weeks after the first day of the last menstrual period. Mean birthweight of the newborn was 3,300 + 422 (SD) g. This corresponded to the 60th percentile for fetal age and weight, according to Lubchenco [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean time of delivery was 39.4 + 1.1 (SD) weeks after the first day of the last menstrual period. Mean birthweight of the newborn was 3,300 + 422 (SD) g. This corresponded to the 60th percentile for fetal age and weight, according to Lubchenco [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The last four started after the 20th week and received up to 16 Units per day. The mean time of delivery was 38.8 + 1.5 weeks, and the mean birthweight of the newborn was 3,400 + 480 g (75th percentile of Lubchenco [21]). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 24 to 41 weeks, intrauterine growth retardation was stated when the fetus weighed less than the 10th percentile of the curve of Lubchenco et al [10]. From 10 to 24 weeks, we used our own curve [unpublished].…”
Section: Subjects and M Eth O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a discussion in the literature o f the accuracy o f growth charts in assessing adequacy o f fetal growth. Studies by Arbuckle, Wilkins, and Sherman (1993) have questioned current norms of birth weight when used against the Colorado growth chart produced by Lubchenco, Hansman, Dressier, and Boyd (1963 1970-1972 and 1986-1988. Their findings for these time periods demonstrated that "...weight distributions for term deliveries have shifted to higher birth weights;...For preterm deliveries the 90th percentile birth weights have decreased, while the tenth percentile birth weights have remained almost unchanged" (Arbuckle et al, 1993, page 47).…”
Section: Low Birth Weight Infants Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%