1992
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90378-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing DNA migration from individual cells subjected to gel electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
146
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
146
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This di erence was similar to that reported in radioresistant and radiosensitive medulloblastoma clones (Tsuboi et al, 1997). In order to investigate the mode of cell death after irradiation we performed assays for apoptosis, using ultrastructural studies, single cell gel electrophoresis (Olive et al, 1991;Kizilian et al, 1999), and annexin V staining. Basal (pre-irradiation) apoptosis was not detectable in S-or AS-IGF1R clones, but after irradiation there was an increase in apoptosis in irradiated AS-IGF1R cells compared with controls (data not shown).…”
Section: Igf1r Downregulation Enhances the Radiosensitivity Of Melanosupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This di erence was similar to that reported in radioresistant and radiosensitive medulloblastoma clones (Tsuboi et al, 1997). In order to investigate the mode of cell death after irradiation we performed assays for apoptosis, using ultrastructural studies, single cell gel electrophoresis (Olive et al, 1991;Kizilian et al, 1999), and annexin V staining. Basal (pre-irradiation) apoptosis was not detectable in S-or AS-IGF1R clones, but after irradiation there was an increase in apoptosis in irradiated AS-IGF1R cells compared with controls (data not shown).…”
Section: Igf1r Downregulation Enhances the Radiosensitivity Of Melanosupporting
confidence: 78%
“…DNA dsb repair measured using the neutral comet assay and cellular radiosensitivity were found not to correlate in a study by Olive et al (1992), however one possible explanation for the difference between the present study and that of Olive et al (1992) may reflect the time interval allowed for repair: 4 h in the previous study and 16 h in the present study. It has been noted that measuring residual DNA dsbs using the neutral comet assay at 4 h may underestimate the level of DNA damage as a result of the increase in the percentage of S-phase cells after irradiation, as S-phase DNA migrates inefficiently.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…A linear relationship between dose and initial and residual DNA dsbs was also seen in the majority of the individual experiments for the other five cell lines, albeit with greater variability (correlation coefficients >0.74) (data not shown). In all experiments, the influence of cell age on assay variability was minimized by using confluent cultures to reduce the proportion of cells in S-phase, as the presence of replication forks in DNA can restrict migration under electrophoresis (Olive et al, 1992;. In each experiment, flow cytometry analysis indicated that the proportion of cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle was always below 18% (range 7-17%, mean 12%), irrespective of the cell line used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure (Olive et al, 1991) was modified as follows. Lymphocytes were seeded in a 24-well plate (1 Â 10 5 for stimulated and 3 Â 10 5 for nonstimulated) and treated 24 h later with 10 mM MNNG.…”
Section: Determination Of Dsbsmentioning
confidence: 99%