2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11339-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing degradation kinetics of mRNAs and half-lives of microRNAs, circRNAs, lncRNAs in blood in vitro using quantitative PCR

Abstract: RNAs are rapidly degraded in samples and during collection, processing and testing. In this study, we used the same method to explore the half-lives of different RNAs and the influencing factors, and compared the degradation kinetics and characteristics of different RNAs in whole blood and experimental samples. Fresh anticoagulant blood samples were incubated at room temperature for different durations, RNAs were extracted, and genes, including internal references, were amplified by real-time quantitative PCR.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For half-life calculation, the antigen concentration (U-value) was calculated from the ratio-value according to the regression equation, where C 0 was the initial antigen concentration, and C 10 was the antigen concentration after 10 days ( t = 10). The half-life (T 1/2 ) of the antigen was calculated using the following equation (Wang and Liu 2022 ): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For half-life calculation, the antigen concentration (U-value) was calculated from the ratio-value according to the regression equation, where C 0 was the initial antigen concentration, and C 10 was the antigen concentration after 10 days ( t = 10). The half-life (T 1/2 ) of the antigen was calculated using the following equation (Wang and Liu 2022 ): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that adenosine to inosine (A>I) RNA editing strongly promotes translation of circRNAs [12,13], suggesting that inosines could provide a ribosomal entry site. CircRNAs are more stable than linear mRNAs, with a half-life of 2-4 days [14,15], which compares to an average half-life of 4 hrs for mRNAs [16]. Due to intramolecular base pairing, circRNAs form rod-like structures with extended double strand RNA sequences [17], and are thus more prone to undergo modifications by ADAR enzymes (adenine deaminase acting on RNA) that recognize double stranded RNA structures and convert adenosines into inosines [18].…”
Section: Introduction 11 Circtau Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As circRNAs lack ends, they are generally resistant to exoribonucleases with approximately 2.5-fold longer half-lives than their linear counterparts (37, 38). CircRNAs are also more stable in the extracellular space, a feature which has led to much interest in their potential use as a diagnostic biomarker (39). Circularity, however, does not prevent susceptibility of circRNAs to endoribonucleases (endoRNases) such as RNase L and RNase P (40, 41).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%