2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing critical care nurses’ intentions to use physical restraints adopting the theory of planned behaviour: A cross-sectional multicentre study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who lack such a good attitude will not continue to conduct the relevant preparatory work [27]. Many previous studies have also confirmed that MHO staff's attitude towards behavior has a positive impact on their behavior intention [28][29][30][31][32]. Therefore, this study infers that a positive emergency attitude indicates a good EPBI.…”
Section: Tpb and Epbisupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Those who lack such a good attitude will not continue to conduct the relevant preparatory work [27]. Many previous studies have also confirmed that MHO staff's attitude towards behavior has a positive impact on their behavior intention [28][29][30][31][32]. Therefore, this study infers that a positive emergency attitude indicates a good EPBI.…”
Section: Tpb and Epbisupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The use of physical restraints (25.2%) in this study is similar to that reported by other studies in our setting 24,37 and to restraint use reported among European nurses by Egerod et al 57 However, higher restraint rates of 33% and 52% have been reported in the United States by Pun et al 19 and in Canada by Burry et al, 35 respectively. The lower use of physical restraints in this study might be explained by the high prevalence of deep sedation and immobility, and associated contextual factors 62 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…and to restraint use reported among European nurses by Egerod et al57 However, higher restraint rates of 33% and 52% have been reported in the United States by Pun et al19 and in Canada by Burry et 35 respectively. The lower use of physical restraints in this study might be explained by the high prevalence of deep sedation and immobility, and associated contextual factors 62. Patient mobility depends greatly on the level of cooperation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Furthermore, regarding the available alternatives, Vía-Calvero et al . (2020) 49 noted that nurses identified family presence as a factor to promote the minimization of physical restraint. 36 Rosa et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%