2017
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing cervical cancer screening in a Kenyan Health Facility: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study

Abstract: Background: Cervical cancer is the commonest cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Screening for cervical cancer among HIV infected women is crucial as they are more at risk of developing the disease and progressing faster once infected with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).Methods: We aimed to determine the factors affecting the utilization of cervical cancer screening among HIV infected women above 18 years of age at Kenyatta National Hospital b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
14
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
8
14
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the pooled prevalence of cervical cancer screening was 13.46% (95%CI: 11.06, 15.86). The result is lower than the study findings in Canada 58% [ 46 ], England 85.7% [ 47 ], Catalonia 50.6% [ 48 ], and Kenya 46% [ 49 ]. The possible reason for this variation could be due to differences in socio-demographic and economic status of the study respondents as well as the countries’ health policy variations like institutional framework to promote screening, which could have largely succeeded in implementing successful programs regarding cervical cancer screening.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Accordingly, the pooled prevalence of cervical cancer screening was 13.46% (95%CI: 11.06, 15.86). The result is lower than the study findings in Canada 58% [ 46 ], England 85.7% [ 47 ], Catalonia 50.6% [ 48 ], and Kenya 46% [ 49 ]. The possible reason for this variation could be due to differences in socio-demographic and economic status of the study respondents as well as the countries’ health policy variations like institutional framework to promote screening, which could have largely succeeded in implementing successful programs regarding cervical cancer screening.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…However, this finding is lower than the study findings in Canada [24] 58%, England [25] 85.7%, Catalonia [26] 50.6%, and Kenya [27] 46%. The possible reason for this variation could be due to differences in socio-demographic and economic status of the study respondents as well as the countries’ promotional policy variations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…However, this finding is lower than the study findings conducted in England 85.7% [46], Canada 58% [47], Catalonia 50.6% [48], Italy 91% [49], and Kenya 46% [50]. e reason for this variation could be due to differences in study participants' level of awareness about cervical cancer and its screening program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%