2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing bilinguals’ speed and accuracy of number judgments across languages: A meta-analytic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they found no significant language differences in performance measures. These findings are consistent with a recent meta-analysis suggesting that performance differences across languages may be driven by factors like proficiency rather than the language of original learning (Garcia et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they found no significant language differences in performance measures. These findings are consistent with a recent meta-analysis suggesting that performance differences across languages may be driven by factors like proficiency rather than the language of original learning (Garcia et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, in a reevaluation of the language bias for arithmetic, Cerda et al (2022) found that proficient, early bilingual adults accessed multiplication facts from memory with equivalent efficiency across languages. These findings are consistent with a recent meta-analysis study suggesting that performance differences across languages may be due more to proficiency in a language than differences in cognitive processing across languages (Garcia et al, 2021). However, it is possible that language differences may arise in more subtle ways, even in more proficient bilinguals, especially when comparing the processing of simple problems to more difficult problems, such as the problem size effect (PSE).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example in school curricula where the first language for learning mathematics is German (LM1) and math classes later switch to a second language (French, LM2), systematic costs have been found for LM2 arithmetic problem solving despite an equal number of years training the LM2 [ 57 ]. A recent meta-analysis found an advantage for solving arithmetic and naming numbers (but not for magnitude comparison tasks) in the L1 [ 58 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis 1: We expected an LM2 cost for lexical retrieval, with slower VOTs for Indo-Arabic digit naming in the LM2 than in the LM1, as suggested by previous studies (Garcia et al, 2021; Lachelin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Bilingual Arithmetic and Transcodingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For bilingual participants who followed the Luxembourgish school system where mathematics is taught first in German for 6 years (LM1) and then in French for 7 years (LM2), slower response times and more errors for complex arithmetic are found for LM2 compared to LM1, even in adults (Van Rinsveld et al, 2015). The LM2 cost for French was further replicated in a second cross-sectional study for the more elementary task of transcoding two-digit Arabic numbers, also until adulthood (Lachelin et al, 2022; see also Garcia et al, 2021 for complementary results in a meta-analysis).…”
Section: Bilingual Arithmetic and Transcodingmentioning
confidence: 83%