2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2372-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing adherence in CML and ways to improvement: Results of a patient-driven survey of 2546 patients in 63 countries

Abstract: CML Advocates Network and were filled in by patients online and offline. Patient characteristics, treatment and motivations were collected. Adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence scale. Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the influence of different factors on adherence. Overall, 2 546 questionnaires from 63 countries and 79 CML patient organisations were evaluable. 32.7% of participants were highly adherent, 46.5% were in the medium and 20.7% in the low adherence gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
59
1
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
59
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Other quantitative studies using a questionnaire found percentages of nonadherent CML patients ranging from 0% to 47%. 11,12,19,23,30,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Differences in the extent of nonadherence in studies are a well-known phenomenon in adherence research and relate to the drug, follow-up period and differences in measurement and calculation of adherence. 9,42 In the present study, a self-composed question was used to measure nonadherence ("How often do you not take your CML medicine?").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other quantitative studies using a questionnaire found percentages of nonadherent CML patients ranging from 0% to 47%. 11,12,19,23,30,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Differences in the extent of nonadherence in studies are a well-known phenomenon in adherence research and relate to the drug, follow-up period and differences in measurement and calculation of adherence. 9,42 In the present study, a self-composed question was used to measure nonadherence ("How often do you not take your CML medicine?").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,42 In the present study, a self-composed question was used to measure nonadherence ("How often do you not take your CML medicine?"). In the other studies, 11,12,19,23,30,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] alternative questionnaires were used to measure medication adherence. Although the differences in measurements make it difficult to compare the results of studies, it is clear that a considerable number of CML patients have difficulties with adhering to their medication regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several factors associated with high adherence to TKI therapy have been reported in the literature. In an international, patient‐led study (Geissler et al , ), factors associated with high adherence were older age, male sex, management of side effects, the administration of only one tablet per day, and patients feeling well informed about CML by the doctor, whereas a recent Polish study (Rychter et al , ) reported that patients over 65 years and patients with at least one comorbid disease had better adherence to TKIs. That same study also found no differences in adherence among patients treated with imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib ( P = 0·249) (Rychter et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An obviously important requirement for an effective treatment is that the treatment is used as indicated. Although CML is a fatal disease, poor patients' compliance with TKI treatment is common and is associated with reduced effectiveness . Marin et al, using an electronic medication monitoring system, showed that proper adherence with TKI treatment is a major predictor of achieving major molecular remission (MMR) with relative risks between 11.7 and 17.6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%