Factors Influencing Acromial and Scapular Spine Strain after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical Studies
Alexander Paszicsnyek,
Olivia Jo,
Harshi Sandeepa Rupasinghe
et al.
Abstract:Background: Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can be devastating complications leading to substantial functional impairments. The purpose of this study was to review factors associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain after RTSA from a biomechanical standpoint. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, and CENTRAL databases were searched and strict inclusion and exc… Show more
“…The rate of post-RTSA acromial fracture (2.2%) in both the study group and the control group was lower than the rates reported in the most recent literature (3.7%-10%). 5 , 11 , 12 However, the cited studies were able to evaluate larger populations of patients undergoing RTSA compared with our study. 11 , 12 Prior studies have evaluated patient factors and sequelae of operative techniques that predispose patients to acromial fractures after RTSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The incidence of acromial and scapular spine stress fractures after RTSA has been reported as up to 10%. 5 Preoperative patient factors including female sex, osteoporosis, and acromial anatomy, as well as the biomechanical changes and excess stress placed on the acromion inherent to RTSA, have been identified as risk factors. 5 …”
“…The rate of post-RTSA acromial fracture (2.2%) in both the study group and the control group was lower than the rates reported in the most recent literature (3.7%-10%). 5 , 11 , 12 However, the cited studies were able to evaluate larger populations of patients undergoing RTSA compared with our study. 11 , 12 Prior studies have evaluated patient factors and sequelae of operative techniques that predispose patients to acromial fractures after RTSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The incidence of acromial and scapular spine stress fractures after RTSA has been reported as up to 10%. 5 Preoperative patient factors including female sex, osteoporosis, and acromial anatomy, as well as the biomechanical changes and excess stress placed on the acromion inherent to RTSA, have been identified as risk factors. 5 …”
“…Although we were unable to determine the fixation construct with the best clinical performance, our study of pooled results suggests that using a single locking plating for lateral acromion and acromial base fractures (Levy Type I and II), and a dual plating construct for more medial fractures (Levy Type II and III) delivers a high union rate and a reasonably low complication rate. Together with the current biomechanical knowledge about acromion and scapular spine fractures following RSA [ 5 ] and plating techniques [ 35 ], it seems that dual plating reveals a stronger fixation construct than single plating and may yield superior outcomes in more medial fractures, although the latter is yet to be proven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several RSA-specific factors influence acromial/scapular spine strain, with glenoid lateralization being one of the main factors leading to increased strain [ 5 ]. Thus the growing trend towards increased lateralization of the center of rotation (COR) may exacerbate the difficult problem of acromion or scapular spine fractures following RSA [ 2 , 6 ].…”
Fractures of the acromion and the scapular spine are established complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and when they occur, the continuous strain by the deltoid along the bony fragments makes healing difficult. Evidence on treatment specific outcomes is poor, making the definition of a gold standard fixation technique difficult. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess whether any particular fixation construct offers improved clinical and/or radiographic outcomes. A systematic review of the literature on fixation of acromial and scapular spine fractures following RSA was carried out based on the guidelines of PRISMA. The search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, and CENTRAL databases with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Methodological quality assessment of each included study was done using the modified Coleman methodology score to asses MQOE. Selection of the studies, data extraction and methodological quality assessment was carried out by two of the authors independently. Only clinical studies reporting on fixation of the aforementioned fractures were considered. Fixation construct, fracture union and time to union, shoulder function and complications were investigated. Nine studies reported on fixation strategies for acromial and scapular spine fractures and were therefore included. The 18 reported results related to fractures in 17 patients; 1 was classified as a Levy Type I fracture, 10 as a Levy Type II fracture and the remaining 7 fractures were defined as Levy Type III. The most frequent fixation construct in type II scapular spine fractures was a single plate (used in 6 of the 10 cases), whereas dual platin was the most used fixation for Levy Type III fractures (5 out of 7). Radiographic union was reported in 15 out of 18 fractures, whereas 1 patient (6.7%) had a confirmed non-union of a Levy Type III scapular spine fracture, requiring revision fixation. There were 5 complications reported, with 2 patients undergoing removal of metal and 1 patient undergoing revision fixation. The Subjective Shoulder Value and Visual Analogue Scale pain score averaged 75% and 2.6 points, respectively. The absolute Constant Score and the ASES score averaged 48.2 and 78.3 points, respectively. With the available data, it is not possible to define a gold standard surgical fixation but it seems that even when fracture union can be achieved, functional outcomes are moderate and there is an increased complication rate. Future studies are required to establish a gold standard fixation technique.
“…The authors found significantly increased strain in all Levy zones at 0° flexion when glenoid lateralization was increased from 0 to +10 mm. Furthermore, a systematic review by Paszicsnyek et al 50 that included 6 studies with 36 cadavers and 11 CT reconstructions concluded that there was a linear relationship between increased glenoid lateralization and increased acromion and SS strain based on 4 included studies demonstrating a positive relationship 45,47,51,52 . However, the influence of glenoid lateralization is likely dependent on humeral lateralization; Shah et al 47 found that cases with greater humeral onlay (+10 or +13 mm) demonstrated a significant increase in acromial strain when lateralizing the glenoid from 0 to +6 mm.…”
» Biomechanical studies report that thin scapular spine (SS) morphology, superiorly placed glenoid components, and increased glenoid baseplate screws contribute to increased acromial and SS strain and may increase fracture risk.
» Clinical risk factors of acromial and SS fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty include increasing age, female sex, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, thin midsubstance acromion morphology, previous acromioplasty, and surgical indication of cuff tear arthropathy.
» Clinical studies show that, in isolation, excessive humeral lengthening, humeral lateralization, and glenoid medialization may increase risk of acromial and SS fractures.
» Biomechanical studies suggest that a combination of glenoid medialization and humeral lateralization (MG/LH) may reduce fracture risk, although this requires clinical correlation.
» Surgeons might reduce fracture risk in patients of high-risk groups by guarding against excessively lengthening the humerus, using a MG/LH prosthesis, and targeting screws to avoid the scapular notch and base of the SS.
Level of Evidence:
Level V. Narrative Review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.