1979
DOI: 10.1016/0010-440x(79)90044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors in the patient-therapist interaction and outcome: A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problem complexity has also been associated with poor relationship development. 99 One significant factor related to negative outcome is therapists' underestimation of the seriousness of problems. 100 In contrast, factors that may be associated with the development of good working relationships include patients who have had therapy previously, have less severe personality disturbances and have begun to address their problems.…”
Section: Patient Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem complexity has also been associated with poor relationship development. 99 One significant factor related to negative outcome is therapists' underestimation of the seriousness of problems. 100 In contrast, factors that may be associated with the development of good working relationships include patients who have had therapy previously, have less severe personality disturbances and have begun to address their problems.…”
Section: Patient Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already some reviews on the influence of certain therapeutic techniques and their effect on the therapeutic alliance or the therapeutic outcome (Ackerman & Hilsenroth, ; Hill, ; Hilsenroth & Cromer, ; Kilmann, Scovern, & Moreault, ). However, of these, only Hill's () article deals directly with the effect of certain statements on the outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators therefore have moved to interactional models, checking for characteristics by treatment technique by pathology interac tions, and to matching strategies. Matching patient and therapist has largely failed, perhaps because of methodological weaknesses and reliance on sim plistic matching variables (Kilmann et al 1979). In consequence, efforts have been renewed to dissect and influence the therapeutic relationship or alliance since there, perhaps, resides the common meeting ground of patient and therapist characteristics, nonspecifi c effects, and the search for characteristics common to all effective interventions (Luborsky 1976, Strupp & Hadley 1979.…”
Section: Refinement and Complexity Of Questions Addressedmentioning
confidence: 99%