Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies

Abstract

Psychometric studies of the organization of the "natural language of personality" have typically employed rating scales as measurement medium and factor analysis as statistical technique. The results of such investigations over the past 30 years have varied greatly, both with respect to number of factors and with respect to the constructs generated. Re-analysis of the correlations of six studies, including the classical work of Cattell, indicated that the domain appears to be well described by five factors, with some suggestion of a sixth. The five factors were related across studies, using the Kaiser-Hunka-Bianchini method. Generally, the factors were highly related, with most indices of relatedness exceeding .90. The five-factor model was tested by the multiple-group method, used to factor a large-scale study of teachers' ratings of children. With slight modification of the originally hypothesized structure, the five-factor model accounted for the observed relationships quite well. The five constructs suggested by the factors appear to be domains of research effort and theoretical concern which have long been of interest to psychologists.

Agreeableness is related to social‐cognitive, but not social‐perceptual, theory of mind

“…High Agreeableness is associated with warmth, friendliness, altruism and compliance to the needs of others (Digman & Takemoto-Chock, 1981;Graziano & Eisenberg, 1997), is uniquely predictive of social support and harmonious relationships (Asendorpf & Wilpers,The aim of this paper is therefore to examine the relationship between Agreeableness, as measured by a standard self-report personality questionnaire, and ToM as measured by objective cognitive tasks. Our general prediction is that there will be a relationship between ToM functioning and Agreeableness.…”

Personality prototype as a risk factor for eating disorders

“…This instrument provides a measure of the Big Five personality dimensions (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) [33][34][35][36] and of 30 more specific traits. Only the Big Five results were used for the present study.…”

Stress reactivity: Five-factor representation of a psychobiological typology.

“…In this case, the key consideration is the link between conscientiousness and setting high standards and striving to perform well. This element of conscientiousness is akin to achievement motivation and even has been referred to as "will to achieve" (Digman & Takemoto-Chock, 1981). The achievement motivation literature indicates that this type of motivation is associated with a willingness to take on challenging performance requirements (Atkinson & Feather, 1966).…”