Factors Important in the Calculation of Hydraulic Conductivity

Abstract

The calculation of hydraulic conductivity by a modified Millington‐Quirk method with a matching factor gave conductivity values closely approximating experimentally measured values. The technique requires knowledge of the moisture characteristic and the saturated conductivity. A number of factors that affect the calculated values and improve the computational results were investigated. Calculated conductivity values decreased with an increasing number of pressure classes at low moisture contents. For all soils tested the calculated conductivities were less than the experimental values at the terminal point of the moisture characteristic. This discrepancy was partially corrected by a small change in the Millington‐Quirk equation, by extending the moisture characteristics to higher suction values, and by reducing the number of pressure classes to approximately 10. A matching factor, the ratio of measured over calculated saturated conductivity, was found necessary for obtaining the best fit of calculated and measured data. Two conductivity functions calculated separately from each moisture characteristic forming a hysteresis loop, converged as the hysteresis loop was translated to higher tensions. All computations were done by computer.

Modelling of River-Groundwater Interactions under Rainfall Events Based on a Modified Tank Model

“…The estimation of matric suction and conductivity uses Fredlund and Xing's method [25], as shown in Figures 10(a) and 13(a). The link between matric suction and water content uses the model in Kunze et al [26], as shown in Figures 10(b) and 13(b). In Figure 9, the slope is 2 m deep and 3.…”

Investigation for the initiation of a loess landslide based on the unsaturated permeability and strength theory

“…The hydraulic conductivity functions (HCF) is estimated empirically by the model proposed by Childs and Collis-Gorge (1950) and improved by Marshall (1958) and Kunze et al (1968). The procedure is performed by dividing SWCC into n equal moisture content increments.…”

Processes, mechanisms, parameters, and modeling approaches for partially saturated flow in soil and rock media; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project

“…The moisture-retention data, in tabulated form without fitting to analytic functions, can be used directly in these 3 models with trapezoidal approximation for the permeability integrals. The permeability predictions can also be expressed in discrete summations, instead of integrals, over pore classes as in the approximations of Marshall (1958), Millington and Quirk (1961), Kunze et al (1968), andSinclair (1981).…”