2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Impacting Library Visibility on Academic Institution Home Pages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). Becher (2015) and Welch (2005) concluded, a relationship appears to exist between the level of degree offered at an institution and their willingness to place the library prominently on the university website. The research in this study takes this concept one step further and compares the research rating between institutions of similar degree offerings and draws a correlation between the research levels.…”
Section: Region Where "Library(-ies)" Residesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6). Becher (2015) and Welch (2005) concluded, a relationship appears to exist between the level of degree offered at an institution and their willingness to place the library prominently on the university website. The research in this study takes this concept one step further and compares the research rating between institutions of similar degree offerings and draws a correlation between the research levels.…”
Section: Region Where "Library(-ies)" Residesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By assigning the highest observed value to these institutions when libraries did not appear on the website, these institutions were able to be evaluated for holistic comparison. It is not clear how these universities provide access to the library website, though research indicates that access via internal user portals may be the reason the library link does not appear (Becher, 2015).…”
Section: Asmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a 2014 study that explored the information needs of public health students, Le concluded that librarians serving public health students must perform targeted marketing to constituents to leverage relevant library services and build relationships [19]. There is also literature that links library visibility on professional schools or departments' websites to the library's involvement in research projects and library use as a whole [20][21][22][23]. This is the case for Yale, where library services for public health have moved from physical embeddedness to embeddedness achieved through mindful marketing, relationship building, and digital presence.…”
Section: Summary Of Similarities and Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%