2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors governing prepulse inhibition and prepulse facilitation of the acoustic startle response in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
96
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
96
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that for the full interpretation of drug effects on PPI, an extended protocol, including multiple prepulse intensities and ISIs, is preferable. Particularly at the shorter ISIs, modulation of the startle responses is a mix of true PPI and of negative PPI or prepulse facilitation (PPF) (Plappert et al, 2004;Swerdlow et al, 2004a,b). The regulation and functional significance of PPF is poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that for the full interpretation of drug effects on PPI, an extended protocol, including multiple prepulse intensities and ISIs, is preferable. Particularly at the shorter ISIs, modulation of the startle responses is a mix of true PPI and of negative PPI or prepulse facilitation (PPF) (Plappert et al, 2004;Swerdlow et al, 2004a,b). The regulation and functional significance of PPF is poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random intertrial intervals (15-30 s) were used between all trials. These conditions were selected based on the reported optimal conditions for measuring PPI in C57BL/6 mice (Plappert et al, 2004). For each individual mouse, the baseline response was used as correction by subtracting an average of six no-stimulation responses, three after the initial acclimation period and three after the test phase in the second series.…”
Section: Prepulse Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPI was assessed by comparing the startle response to the acoustic stimuli following prepulse to the initial response using the following formula: % response ¼ 100 Â ((SÀPS)/S)), where S is the mean startle amplitude without prepulses and PS is the mean startle response following the prepulse condition. Response (100%) means that there was no effect of prepulse on the startle response (Plappert et al, 2004).…”
Section: Prepulse Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a critical time interval, called the lead time interval T or the interstimulus interval, between 20 and 800 ms in rodents (Hoffman and Ison 1980;Yeomans et al 2006;Plappert et al 2004) or between 45 and 2,020 ms in monkeys (Winslow et al 2002), between the prepulse onset and the pulse onset, relation (8), which comes from the transmission time difference between PPI pathway and ASR pathway, converging at the NRPC. The strongest inhibition of ASR occurs when the prepulse, with 10-30-ms duration, precedes the startle stimulus by the lead interval (Swerdlow 1992).…”
Section: Model Neural Network For Acoustic Startle Reflex and Prepulsmentioning
confidence: 99%