Factors for self-assessment score of interprofessional team collaboration in community hospitals in Japan

Haruta, Junji; Ozone, Sachiko; Goto, Ryohei

doi:10.1136/fmch-2019-000202

Cited by 9 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(35 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…was ≥0.50, which supports convergent validity. Known-group validity demonstrated the expected difference among relationships between nurses and non-nurses (Haruta et al, 2019). Overall, these validated steps warrant the value of JASSIC final version as a selfassessment tool.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…For convergent validity, the correlation between the total score of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II (AITCS-II) (Orchard et al, 2018), whose Japanese version was validated in a similar way to the present questionnaire (Yamamoto & Haruta, 2019), and the total score of JASSIC final version was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. For known-group validity, the total scores for JASSIC final version between nurses and non-nurses were analyzed with an unpaired t-test based on a previous study in Japan, which showed that the AITCS score for nurses is higher than that for other professionals (Haruta et al, 2019). Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software (version 26) and Amos 25 Graphics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of a Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC)

Haruta

Goto

2021

Journal of Interprofessional Care

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC), which consists of six domains: Patient-/Client-/Family-/Community-Centered, Interprofessional Communication, Role Contribution, Facilitation Relationship, Reflection, and Understanding of Others. Validity of JASSIC was confirmed through a four-step process consisting of expert discussion, cognitive debriefing, feasibility, and statistical analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed by testing the correlation between the sum scores of JASSIC and the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II(AITCS-II). First, 24 items were created through discussions among physicians, a nurse, a medical educator, and an information sociologist. Second, the items were modified by cognitive debriefing of a physician, nurse, pharmacist, occupational therapist, and social worker. Third, we provided the developed JASSIC for professionals at Hospital X (n = 139) and revised the wording and composition of the items. Finally, CFA among professionals at Hospital Y (n = 153) identified a 6-domain structure (GFI: 0.847, AGFI: 0.782, RMSEA: 0.088). Cronbach's alpha was 0.92, and the correlation coefficient with AITCS-II was 0.72. Ongoing research into JASSIC will promote effective interprofessional collaborative practice not only in Japan but also other countries which share a similar culture and system.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC)

Haruta

Goto

2021

Journal of Interprofessional Care

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Destaca-se que desde 2017, período no qual as ementas foram avaliadas, a comissão de organização do curso e a comissão de graduação têm a proposta e iniciativa de reorganizar as ementas de modo a melhorar as competências adquiridas nas disciplinas da graduação. Esses espaços de discussão têm potencial para servir tanto como ferramenta de aprendizagem em saúde, quanto como método de melhora do serviço e qualidade do ambiente de trabalho para a equipe de saúde 26 .…”

Section: Conclusõesunclassified

Abordagem sobre o ensino interdisciplinar e interprofissional em uma Faculdade de Medicina Brasileira

Souza

Usp

Alves

et al. 2021

Medicina (Ribeirão Preto)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Educação Interprofissional (EIP) é uma tendência internacional, contemplada pelas Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DNCs) dos cursos de saúde, presente também nas DCNs do curso médico de 2014, ao incluir interprofissionalidade como meio de atender as múltiplas dimensões das necessidades dos usuários do sistema de saúde. A Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da USP abriga seis cursos de graduação em saúde além de Medicina, podendo ser um campo para efetiva formação que enfatize o trabalho em equipe. Objetivo: o objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar de que forma as experiências de interação multiprofissional e interdisciplinaridade (ID/MP) são oferecidas nas disciplinas para os estudantes de graduação em Medicina da FMRP. Método: Levantamento documental das palavras multiprofissional, interprofissional, multidisciplinar e interdisciplinar nos objetivos, roteiros de aulas e atividades, avaliação e bibliografia. Os achados foram tabulados em planilhas e classificados de acordo com o ano de oferecimento da disciplina no ciclo básico (primeiros dois anos), clínico (dois anos intermediários) e internato (dois anos finais). Resultados: Os termos relacionados da ID/MP foram identificados em 11 (13,9%) das 79 disciplinas do currículo obrigatório do curso de Medicina, sendo mais frequentes no internato. Quatro das 109 disciplinas optativas oferecidas entre o 1° e 5° ano em 2017 apresentaram os termos procurados. Conclusão: A oferta formal e planejada de experiência em atuação ID/MP foi pequena, apesar de crescente ao longo do curso de Medicina.

show abstract

“…Research in Japan that assessed the practice of interprofessional collaboration of medical personnel in three hospitals has shown that age (i.e., younger professionals) and profession (e.g., nursing) were the most influential positive factors in creating a collaborative environment [16]. Healthcare practitioners from countries with complementary models (e.g., United States and Israel) possess more positive attitudes to interprofessional collaboration than healthcare practitioners from countries with hierarchical models (e.g., Italy, Mexico, and including Indonesia) [13,[17][18][19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effective Clinical Pathway Improves Interprofessional Collaboration and Reduces Antibiotics Prophylaxis Use in Orthopedic Surgery in Hospitals in Indonesia

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical pathways can improve the quality of health services. The effectiveness and impact of implementing clinical pathways are controversial. The preparation of clinical pathways not only enacts therapeutic guidelines but requires mutual agreement in accordance with the roles, duties, and contributions of each profession in the team. This study aimed to investigate the perception of interprofessional collaboration practices and the impact of clinical pathway implementation on collaborative and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) prophylactic antibiotics per 100 bed-days in orthopedic surgery. The Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) questionnaire was used as a tool to measure healthcare’ perceptions of collaborative practice. The clinical pathway (CP) in this study was adapted from existing CPs published by the Indonesian Orthopaedic Association (Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia, PABOI) and was commended by local domestic surgeons and orthopedic bodies. We then compared post-implementation results with pre-implementation clinical pathway data using ANCOVA to explore our categorical data and its influence towards CPAT response. ANOVA was then employed for aggregated DDD per 100 bed-days to compare pre and post intervention. The results showed that the relationships among members were associated with the working length. Six to ten years of working had a significantly better relationship among members than those who have worked one to five years. Interestingly, pharmacists’ leadership score was significantly lower than other professions. The clinical pathway implementation reduced barriers in team collaboration, improved team coordination and organization, and reduced third-generation cephalosporin use for prophylaxis in surgery (pre: 59 DDD per 100 bed-days; post: 28 DDD per 100 bed-days). This shows that the clinical pathway could benefit antibiotic stewardship in improving antibiotic prescription, therefore reducing the incidence of resistant bacteria.

show abstract

Factors for self-assessment score of interprofessional team collaboration in community hospitals in Japan

Cited by 9 publications

References 34 publications

Development of a Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC)

Development of a Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC)

Abordagem sobre o ensino interdisciplinar e interprofissional em uma Faculdade de Medicina Brasileira

Effective Clinical Pathway Improves Interprofessional Collaboration and Reduces Antibiotics Prophylaxis Use in Orthopedic Surgery in Hospitals in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About