Factors for Science Park Planning

Scientific and Methodological Foundations of Establishing of Composite Indicator System for Comparative Assessment of Activities of Technoparks

“…The following can pertain to the database of creativity [28]: economic benefit of creativity, inventive activity for economic sectors, other outcomes of creative activity and etc. The main sectors covered by creative sectors are as follows: economic benefits of creative industry, the percentage of population engaged in creative industry, trade value of creative industry, economic benefits of e-trade, inventive capacity of business sectors, innovation activity under the condition of patent application, etc.…”

Technology parks in brazil: an analysis of the determinants of performance evaluation

“…These studies can be divided into individual case studies, which have been associated with inductive approaches to building of theories and in multiple case studies, where general lessons can be deduced looking for common points between the cases (Hobbs et al, 2017;Phan et al, 2005). Premature conclusions are sometimes made regarding the success and failure of the technology park, based on case studies that do not consider the potential for strategy change, paving the way for final success, and often end up denigrating the image of the analyzed entity (Etzkowitz & Zhou, 2018), without considering the dependent variables involved such as maturity and objectives of the analyzed park, nature of the stakeholders involved, geographical location and the level of regional development (Albahari et al, 2018;Wasim, 2014).…”

Impact of inter-organizational and extraorganizational factors on the policies of Science and Technology Parks in emerging economies

“…The summarized results are given in Table 1. (Kostka, 2014;Mu & di Benedetto, 2011;Wasim, 2014) Obstacles to entry/deregulation, access to foreign markets, transfer of technology, private demand requirements, supply regulations Policymaking for creating business opportunities (Bergek et al, 2015;Prodan, 2007;Saji & Mishra, 2013;Silva et al, 2020;UNCTAD, 2017) Loans, tax on wealth and heritage, business angels, venture capital, tax on fortune, stock market and corporate buyout Policymaking for attracting investment (Aarikka-Stenroos & Sandberg, 2012;Seyoum, 2004;Zaridis & Mousiolis, 2014) Traditional business training, entrepreneurship, restart Policymaking for developing capacity and capability (O'shea et al, 2004;Smith & Larimer, 2017;Teece, 2010) Entrepreneurship infrastructure (public), entrepreneurship infrastructure (private) Policymaking for infrastructure (Bali & Zarea, 2018;Padilla-Pérez & Gaudin, 2014;Shaw & Allen, 2018) Tax on private income, tax on businesses and fiscal incentives, social security, administrative responsibilities, labor market rules, bankruptcy rules Policymaking for creating incentives (Bergek et al, 2015;Gibb & Hannon, 2006;Jack et al, 2009;Machnik-Słomka & Kordel, 2016) Entrepreneurial motivation, special incentives, communication with legends Policymaking for culture and otivation 2.2. Intra-organizational factors and S&T park policy Bigliardi et al (2006) believe that science parks follow various objectives depending on the impact on the organization and the region.…”

“…In the following research, the intra-organizational factors and policymaking at S&T parks are discussed. Wasim (2014) conducted research on the factors involved in science park planning. His findings identified the factors effective in S&T park planning as follows: government (administration, stakeholders, target group, capital, technological concentration), growth (networks, business support, infrastructure, motivations, culture), external factors (R&D policy, financial policy, stock markets, unofficial economy, foreign investment).…”