2009
DOI: 10.1177/0734242x09335700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors driving the development of healthcare waste management in the United Kingdom over the past 60 years

Abstract: Since the creation of the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom in 1948 there have been significant changes in the way waste materials produced by healthcare facilities have been managed due to a number of environmental, legal and social drivers. This paper reviews the key changes in legislation and healthcare waste management that have occurred in the UK between 1948 and the present time. It investigates reasons for the changes and how the problems associated with healthcare wastes have been add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In developed countries, waste is usually segregated at source and stored temporarily in properly labeled store rooms. Moreover, there exist legal provisions for site decontamination and spillage control (Townend et al, 2009). Provisions for safe storage of hospital wastes have been noted in some hospitals in the developing countries (Al-Khatib et al, 2009;Hanumantha Rao, 2009).…”
Section: Waste Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developed countries, waste is usually segregated at source and stored temporarily in properly labeled store rooms. Moreover, there exist legal provisions for site decontamination and spillage control (Townend et al, 2009). Provisions for safe storage of hospital wastes have been noted in some hospitals in the developing countries (Al-Khatib et al, 2009;Hanumantha Rao, 2009).…”
Section: Waste Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is the important issue of healthcare waste management, which would merit its own historical review (e.g. Kenny and Priyadarshini, 2021 ; Liang, et al, 2021 ; WHO, 1999 , 2014 ; Townend, et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Swm Emerges Onto the Global Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every state has different rules-for example, Alabama requires medical waste generators to register with the state whereas Colorado does not 7,8 -allowing interstate commerce to become fraught and error prone, as waste technicians moving across state lines need to be retrained in order to be able to comply with their new home state's regulations. Furthermore, a lack of a single regulatory framework makes it difficult for waste management programs to be scaled up because each state requires a particular program that is tailored to its particular set of rules; the first step to successful health care waste management is an integrated national policy, 9,10 which the current lack of scalability prevents.…”
Section: Lack Of a Unified Regulatory Regimementioning
confidence: 99%