2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.11.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Determining the Contamination of Bone Tissue Procured from Cadaveric and Multiorgan Donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must bear in mind that the microorganisms which were isolated in our cultures belonged to the gastrointestinal flora, a type uncommonly found in this tissue (Bohatyrewicz et al 2006;Deijkers et al 1997;Ibrahim et al 2004;Ivory and Thomas 1993;Vehmeyer et al 2002). The accidental rupture of a great blood vessel in the knee combined to the positive cultures obtained reinforced the idea of the contaminating of the donor's blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We must bear in mind that the microorganisms which were isolated in our cultures belonged to the gastrointestinal flora, a type uncommonly found in this tissue (Bohatyrewicz et al 2006;Deijkers et al 1997;Ibrahim et al 2004;Ivory and Thomas 1993;Vehmeyer et al 2002). The accidental rupture of a great blood vessel in the knee combined to the positive cultures obtained reinforced the idea of the contaminating of the donor's blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The most widely used approach to perform a microbiological test of a recovered allograft is taking tissue samples during surgery for a culture (Bohatyrewicz et al 2006;Forsell and Liesman 2000;Journeaux et al 1999;Vehmeyer et al 2001). The most frequently cultivated microorganisms in samples of bone or tendinous allografts are often bacteria with a low virulence level, mainly cutaneous flora, which are thought to come from the donors themselves or by contamination from the extracting equipment (Deijkers et al 1997;Vehmeyer et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other factors also tends to play a role in healing process with the use of grafts. Time interval between procurement and transplantation of graft is an important factor (Bohatyrewicz et al, 2006). It is said that an autogenous bone graft retains its viability for upto 2 hours when kept in normal saline (Laursen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Allogenic Bone Graftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical advantage of osteogenic, osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties is diminished through the fact that the respective cells inside the autograft will not survive longer than 2 h [9]. Thus, the time interval between harvesting and transplantation of the graft is an important factor [10]. Autogenous bone grafts retain their viability for 2 h when kept in normal saline [11].…”
Section: Autologous Bone Graftsmentioning
confidence: 99%