2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors controlling soil CO2 effluxes and the effects of rewetting on effluxes in adjacent deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forests in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
8
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that CO 2 is the soil gas that has received the third most attention for studying the effects of rewetting and thawing of soils. Increases in CO 2 flux following rewetting of dry soils have been reported in multiple terrestrial ecosystems and various land-use types, including cropland (Kessavalou et al, 1998), grazing pasture (Xu and Baldocchi, 2004), forest (Kim et al, 2010b), grassland (Joos et al, 2010), savannas (Castaldi et al, 2010), and desert (Sponseller and Fisher, 2008). Incubation experiments have yielded similar patterns, showing CO 2 flux increases after rewetting in soils from cropland (Beare et al, 2009), grazing pasture (Wu et al, 2010b), forest (Fierer and Schimel, 2003), grassland (Xiang et al, 2008), peatland (Goldhammer and Blodau, 2008) and desert (Sponseller and Fisher, 2008) ecosystems.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This shows that CO 2 is the soil gas that has received the third most attention for studying the effects of rewetting and thawing of soils. Increases in CO 2 flux following rewetting of dry soils have been reported in multiple terrestrial ecosystems and various land-use types, including cropland (Kessavalou et al, 1998), grazing pasture (Xu and Baldocchi, 2004), forest (Kim et al, 2010b), grassland (Joos et al, 2010), savannas (Castaldi et al, 2010), and desert (Sponseller and Fisher, 2008). Incubation experiments have yielded similar patterns, showing CO 2 flux increases after rewetting in soils from cropland (Beare et al, 2009), grazing pasture (Wu et al, 2010b), forest (Fierer and Schimel, 2003), grassland (Xiang et al, 2008), peatland (Goldhammer and Blodau, 2008) and desert (Sponseller and Fisher, 2008) ecosystems.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Soil moisture conditions before rewetting also influence the response (Orchard and Cook, 1983;Cable et al, 2008;Harms and Grimm, 2012), as can the length and severity of drought periods (Unger et al, 2010), and rain pulse size (Sponseller, 2007;Chen et al, 2009). Based on our literature review, we identified the existence of a threshold in soil moisture at 12-20 % gravimetric moisture content, below which a substantial increase in soil CO 2 flux after rewetting is typically observed (Davidson et al, 1998;Xu and Qi, 2001;Rey et al, 2002;Yuste et al, 2003;Dilustro et al, 2005;Cable et al, 2008;Chou et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2010b;Misson et al, 2010). The effects of rewetting may decline with successive drying and rewetting cycles, possibly as a result of a limited pool of labile substrates that have built up over time or during the dry season (Schimel and Mikan, 2005;Goldberg et al, 2008).…”
Section: Carbon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the field, some studies have removed leaf litter from the soil surface (Rey et al 2002;Lee et al 2004;DeForest et al 2009;Zimmermann et al 2009) or used an isotope mass balance method (Cisneros-Dozal et al 2007) to determine the contribution of leaf litter respiration to soil respiration. However, in most soil respiration studies, leaf litter respiration has been included in soil respiration and the effect of wetting and drying on soil or leaf litter respiration has not been separated out (Borken et al 2003(Borken et al , 2006Muhr and Borken 2009;Kim et al 2010). Also, models have not been constructed on the basis of leaf litter respiration measurements in the field, and leaf litter respiration has not been scaled up to the site or landscape level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%