Factors Contributing to the Success of NIH-Designated Underrepresented Minorities in Academic and Nonacademic Research Positions

Abstract

We report the outcomes of a survey of underrepresented minorities (URMs) in life science academic (e.g., faculty) and nonacademic (e.g., research-related) positions seeking to ascertain variables that contribute to their success (e.g., favorable or desired outcome). Given that they had positions in research careers, all respondents were presumed to be successful, and we sought to identify shared factors that were associated with this success. As in previous studies, respondents reported that undergraduate research opportunities, performing research in small- to medium-sized laboratories, and access to mentors throughout all stages of training were important factors for success in their careers. Surprisingly, analysis of the survey results suggests that a record of publications in high–impact factor journals was not essential for their success. There were fundamental differences in the experiences and needs of URMs in academic and nonacademic careers. For example, academic URMs ranked having mentorship as their first choice in order of importance compared with the nonacademic respondents, who ranked this category as their fifth selection. These findings suggest that taking diverse approaches toward these groups is critical for ensuring that all of the most creative minds have an equal opportunity to contribute to realizing our national research goals and diversified workforce.

Suggestions for Improving Invited Speaker Diversity To Reflect Trainee Diversity

“…Long-standing systemic bias, sexism, and racism have contributed to the underrepresentation of many racial and ethnic groups, as well as of women, in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields (1)(2)(3)(4). Specifically, within the field of biomedical research in the United States, the proportion of underrepresented minorities at the Full Professor level has remained consistently low at 4% (survey data taken from the NIH from 2001 to 2013) (5,6).…”

Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics

“…Efforts must intentionally include women, underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, disadvantaged populations, and individuals with disabilities. Initiatives should not focus exclusively on early-stage recruitment; instead, they must also include incentives to recruit and retain a diverse workforce at all career stages 74 as well as new approaches for cultivating the next generation of genomics practitioners.…”

Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce

“…10 Investigators at minority serving institutions (MSI), which are often teaching-intensive and have smaller research portfolios, have fewer mentors with a history of securing competitive grant funding. [11][12][13] Yet, research resources such as tools, software, specialized equipment, institutional support services, access to targeted collaborations and research networks are critically important to URG investigators' research funding. Inequitable access to resources that enable and expedite research may have long-term impacts on securing grant funding.…”