2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0025-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors at medical school influencing students’ decisions to pursue a career in ophthalmology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These made most of the students like the subject and also created role models within the department. These findings are similar to the study by Hsiao et al ,[ 21 ] who reported that the quality of training is more effective than just extending the duration of exposure during the internship. The study by Mehmood et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These made most of the students like the subject and also created role models within the department. These findings are similar to the study by Hsiao et al ,[ 21 ] who reported that the quality of training is more effective than just extending the duration of exposure during the internship. The study by Mehmood et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An interesting finding in both cohorts was the high rate of having a family member in the applicant's specialty (23.6% ophthalmology vs. 27.1% non-ophthalmology, p ¼ 0.540), as well as premedical school exposure to the applicant's selected specialty (75.3% ophthalmology vs. 83.5% non-ophthalmology, p ¼ 0.129; ►Table 2). This supports existing literature that increased and early exposure affects an applicant's choice of specialty 4,11,16 and highlights the significance of personal background on specialty selection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…16 Our study findings highlight the opportunities that ophthalmology departments provide to medical students, and are consistent with reports from other recent studies regarding the substantial impact of such departments on medical student interest and success in pursuing a career in ophthalmology. 11,16 Our study has several limitations. The response rate is limited, although the 61.1% response rate among non-ophthalmology applicants at our institution compares favorably to existing literature surveying medical students at a single institution (35.5-78.1%), 2,4,10 and the 46.0% response rate of ophthalmology applicants compares favorably with recently published surveys of ophthalmology applicants (36.4-58.3%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One study found that participants in the Duke-Elder exam were not more likely to enter ophthalmology trainee than non-participants and that the presence of an ophthalmology undergraduate society at a medical school was correlated with a 1.37-fold increase of .29.5% of students who scored in the top 20 nationally in the Duke-Elder exam subsequently entered ophthalmology training [ 15 ]. Both studies concluded that, although the Duke-Elder exam is used as part of shortlisting criteria for ophthalmology training, there may be a perceived ‘unimportance’ of the exam in comparison to other criteria and this may dissuade students from participating in the exam [ 2 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%