2015
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with variability in management of vascular access ports

Abstract: Guidelines and clinical practice recommendations vary on the management of vascular access ports. Traditionally, patient, health system and healthcare professional's factors have been interrelated in studies of clinical practice variability. Understanding variation in the management of vascular access ports and to identify the influence of these factors in the compliance with the most common recommendations of vascular access guidelines, is an important first step for designing targeted improvement interventio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, failing to achieve the objectives defined by the clinical practice guides cannot only be related to the effectiveness of the procedures mentioned in them or the adherence of professionals and patients to them (Saxer, de Bie, Dassen, & Halfens, ). It is necessary to analyse and consider the negative variability in care (Chaillet & Dumont, ; Fernández‐de‐Maya & Richart‐Martínez, ), together with inertia actions which, as automatic behaviours lacking reasoning and clinical judgement, determine professional actions in situations and contexts, removed from the available scientific evidence (Sadeghi‐Bazargani, Tabrizi, & Azami‐Aghdash, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, failing to achieve the objectives defined by the clinical practice guides cannot only be related to the effectiveness of the procedures mentioned in them or the adherence of professionals and patients to them (Saxer, de Bie, Dassen, & Halfens, ). It is necessary to analyse and consider the negative variability in care (Chaillet & Dumont, ; Fernández‐de‐Maya & Richart‐Martínez, ), together with inertia actions which, as automatic behaviours lacking reasoning and clinical judgement, determine professional actions in situations and contexts, removed from the available scientific evidence (Sadeghi‐Bazargani, Tabrizi, & Azami‐Aghdash, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large Spanish study that explored factors associated with practice variability in vascular access device management, a long-term, implanted medical device that requires accessing via a port with a non-coring needle, a procedure that is similar to the reservoir refill procedure, found that geographic location and practice site size were factors that influenced practice variability. The study found that large chemotherapy units were more likely to observe clinical practice recommendations (Fernández- de-Maya & Richart-Martinez, 2015). Our results were consistent with the Fernández-de-Maya and Richart-Martinez (2015) findings in that most participants performed less than 10 procedures per week, which may represent small pump practice sites and only half of the total sample used CPG in practice.…”
Section: Experiencesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The study found that large chemotherapy units were more likely to observe clinical practice recommendations (Fernández- de-Maya & Richart-Martinez, 2015). Our results were consistent with the Fernández-de-Maya and Richart-Martinez (2015) findings in that most participants performed less than 10 procedures per week, which may represent small pump practice sites and only half of the total sample used CPG in practice. However, use of CPGs increased significantly in practice compared to training (p < .0003).…”
Section: Experiencesupporting
confidence: 88%