2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with use of breast cancer screening services by women aged ≥ 40 years in Korea: The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 (KNHANES III)

Abstract: BackgroundDespite evidence that breast cancer screening reduces morbidity and mortality, until recently most women have not undergone regular mammogram examinations in Korea. We aimed to identify factors associated with use of breast cancer screening services.MethodsThe Health Promotion Knowledge, Attitude and Practice survey (HP-KAP survey) is part of the Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 (KNHANES III), a nationwide health survey in Korea. Of 7,802 individuals who participated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
61
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
61
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies of cancer screening (Kwon et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2010;Park et al, 2010), our results indicate that education level is significantly associated with the gastric cancer screening rate. By contrast, monthly household income did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous studies of cancer screening (Kwon et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2010;Park et al, 2010), our results indicate that education level is significantly associated with the gastric cancer screening rate. By contrast, monthly household income did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Education level not only determines the social and physical environments, but is an important factor that could cause a difference in understanding the health beliefs and expected gains (Jang et al, 2007). Lee et al reported a large disparity in cancer screening rates among subjects with different education levels, whereas the disparity in the cancer screening rates according to income level had decreased (Lee et al, 2010). Our finding that a lower education level was significantly associated with less participation in gastric cancer screening, while the income level did not show significance, can be explained in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,16 The survey asked about sociodemographic factors known to be associated with screening practices, including age, 20,21 sex, 22 marital status, 18,20 education, 20,21,23 monthly household income, 18,24,25 employment status, 24 smoking status, 21 alcohol consumption, 25 and perceived health status. [20][21][22] Information regarding the presence of comorbidities was also collected because the frequent medical encounters because of such conditions are associated with cancer screening practices 23,26 and included hypertension; dyslipidemia; diabetes; osteoarthritis; rheumatoid arthritis; and cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, chronic liver, lung, kidney, or gastrointestinal disease. Clinical variables, including the date of the primary cancer diagnosis, stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, and types of cancer treatment patients had received, were collected through the review of medical records.…”
Section: Measures and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of education level, disparities in attendance were observed for the opportunistic screening program. In another study, Lee et al conducted a study regarding factors associated with the use of breast cancer screening services by females in Korea (Lee et al, 2010). They concluded more attention should be given to under-represented groups, particularly the elderly, those with a low education level, smokers and those with a negative attitude towards screening tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%