2006
DOI: 10.1002/erv.720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with treatment seeking in a community sample of European American and Mexican American women with eating disorders

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with treatment seeking in a community sample of European American and Mexican American women with eating disorders. We also explored which variables were associated with receiving treatment. Participants were 190 women with eating disorders (80 Mexican American, 110 European American) who were diagnosed using the SCID-IV and Eating Disorder Examination. Results indicated that treatment seeking is associated with ethnicity (i.e. being European Amer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to what we found in other studies that examine the feasibility and efficacy of the CBTgsh program (Shea et al, 2014; Shea et al, 2012), Mexican American women described the core components (i.e., intervention of problematic cognitions and behaviors) and the self-help feature as the most helpful and empowering aspect of the treatment. The systematic approach of the book and the flexibility of the program structure may be especially appealing to a population who would not otherwise seek professional psychological services due to a myriad of cultural, financial, and intuitional barriers (Cachelin et al, 2006; Cawthorne, 2008). The low-cost, self-help feature provides an alternative to participating in more expensive commercial weight loss programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to what we found in other studies that examine the feasibility and efficacy of the CBTgsh program (Shea et al, 2014; Shea et al, 2012), Mexican American women described the core components (i.e., intervention of problematic cognitions and behaviors) and the self-help feature as the most helpful and empowering aspect of the treatment. The systematic approach of the book and the flexibility of the program structure may be especially appealing to a population who would not otherwise seek professional psychological services due to a myriad of cultural, financial, and intuitional barriers (Cachelin et al, 2006; Cawthorne, 2008). The low-cost, self-help feature provides an alternative to participating in more expensive commercial weight loss programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inequities are especially germane for mental health, for which racial minorities are at risk for non-detection in primary care practices 19. Several studies also support that ethnicity may be a risk correlate of reduced access to care for an eating disorder in the U.S 20,21. Concerns about ethnic disparities in service access for an eating disorder have been raised for ethnic minority patients in the UK2224 and for immigrants to Australia as well 11.…”
Section: Ethnic Disparities In Utilization Of Eating Disorders Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet despite their problem severity, Latina women’s eating disorders largely go undetected and untreated (Becker et al, 2010; Cachelin, Rebeck, Veisel, & Striegel-Moore, 2001; Cachelin, Striegel-Moore, & Regan, 2006). Research has demonstrated Latina women encounter numerous barriers—both on individual and institutional levels—to seeking professional help, including feelings of shame, perceived stigma, financial constraints, limited access to affordable healthcare services, and a paucity of culturally competent providers (Cachelin et al, 2001; Cachelin & Striegel-Moore, 2006; Dow, 2011). In one study, fewer than 28% of a sample of Mexican American women with weight and eating disorders ever had sought treatment, and of this group only 6.6% actually had received treatment (Cachelin et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%