1989
DOI: 10.1136/oem.46.9.597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with the development of progressive massive fibrosis in British coalminers: a case-control study.

Abstract: Possible associations between the incidence of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) over periods of average length 11 years during 1963-80 and a range of explanatory variables, both environmental and medical, were examined in a study group of4772 miners and ex-miners using casecontrol methods. Cases were members of the study group who developed PMF during the study period; controls were men who remained free of the disease. Cases and controls were matched on cumulative dust exposure to the start of the study per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For most miners, the largest portion of their cumulative exposures was received prior to the start of follow-up because most of their work experience occurred before follow-up began and because the respirable coal mine dust concentrations were reduced after 1969, when the U.S. coal dust standard was enacted 230 USC 841-8451. Further, an important factor in disease development may be the residence time of dust in the lungs [Maclaren et al, 1989;Hurley et al, 19871, such that the earlier exposures might have a greater influence on disease development and progression. For these reasons, it is unlikely that miners' exposures were underestimated appreciably, particularly among the older miners, who were also those most likely to have developed disease.…”
Section: Cumulative Exposure Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most miners, the largest portion of their cumulative exposures was received prior to the start of follow-up because most of their work experience occurred before follow-up began and because the respirable coal mine dust concentrations were reduced after 1969, when the U.S. coal dust standard was enacted 230 USC 841-8451. Further, an important factor in disease development may be the residence time of dust in the lungs [Maclaren et al, 1989;Hurley et al, 19871, such that the earlier exposures might have a greater influence on disease development and progression. For these reasons, it is unlikely that miners' exposures were underestimated appreciably, particularly among the older miners, who were also those most likely to have developed disease.…”
Section: Cumulative Exposure Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on the development of CWP were reported in the U.K. (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6), and such studies on pneumoconiosis/silicosis in workers other than coal miners have also been reported in sandblasters (7,8), in pencil slate workers (9), iron-ore miners (10), granite miners (11,12), and so on (13)(14)(15). Without the newly additional dust exposure effects, we have declared that the progression of pneumoconiosis was observed even after retirement from coal mining.…”
Section: A B T a B L E 3 P R O G R E S S I O N P A T T E R N O F S mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two recognised radiological patterns of CWP are simple pneumoconiosis (SP) and progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) 5. However, SP is asymptomatic and has no effect on pulmonary function,6 although it may progress to PMF 7. PMF is progressive, with rounded masses of confluent fibrosis seen in the upper lobes of the lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%