“…Only descriptive statistics were used to analyze type of EEG use and treatment goals because a large proportion of studies had unclear/ unknown or mixed monitoring and treatment goals, which precluded meaningful statistical analyses (Table 2). The rate of continuous EEG (CEEG) monitoring was higher in publications after 2010 (pre-2010: continuous 8,18,25,27,28,[34][35][36]40,[53][54][55] : 76%, 244 of 321 patients; intermittent 4,19,23,37,56 : 24%, 77 of 321 patients; and 2010 onward: continuous 3,6,7,[11][12][13][20][21][22]29,32,33,41,42,45,49,51,[62][63][64][65][66]68 : 89%, 493 of 555 patients; intermittent 5,10,50,61 : 11%, 62 of 555 patients). The type of EEG monitoring was unknown/unclear for 45% of patients.…”