2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with recurrence in patients with curatively resected stage I–II lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SUVmax ≥10 was the best independent predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival. Koo et al [14] investigated factors associated with recurrence in 310 patients with stage I or II disease. There were 106 recurrences in the study population and a SUVmax ≥4.5 was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence after resection, with an OR of 5.45.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SUVmax ≥10 was the best independent predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival. Koo et al [14] investigated factors associated with recurrence in 310 patients with stage I or II disease. There were 106 recurrences in the study population and a SUVmax ≥4.5 was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence after resection, with an OR of 5.45.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,45,54,65] A more nuanced approach to surveillance for lung cancer may be needed. If we could predict which patients are more likely to experience recurrence of disease or development of a second primary lung cancer, [2,66] we might offer more aggressive surveillance to those individuals. Future work should explore risk stratification schemata based on patient, tumor, and other clinical factors that could guide tailored surveillance strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Early stage NSCLC is generally treated with curative intent therapy, but 5-year recurrence rates are estimated in the range of 9%-46%, even with treatment. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Routine surveillance of these patients is recommended to enable early detection of recurrences or new cancers. [8][9][10][11] Lung cancer surveillance has been recommended using two imaging modalities: chest radiography (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scanning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Оценка законо-мерности рецидива после операции и возможной токсич-ности, связанных с ПОРТ, определяет соотношение поль-за / риск в послеоперационной терапии.Даже если риск местных рецидивов при начальных стадиях рака легких, как правило, считается малым по сравнению с риском от-даленного рецидива, частота локального рецидива, край-не непостоянна, и по литературным данным, составляет от 6% до 45% при I стадии и от 7% до 55% для II стадии заболевания [32][33][34] Согласно всех приведенных выше исследований, ве-роятность развития рецидива заболевания определялась критериями T и N. Данную оценку можно охарактеризо-вать «количественной». Однако, на сегодняшний день, есть результаты работ, которые отражают значимость дру-гих -«качественных» факторов риска для местного и реги-онального рецидива.…”
Section: Wwwmalignanttumorsorg Journal Of Malignant Tumoursunclassified