Factors associated with receipt of residential rehabilitation by opiate users indicate that these clients are more amenable to drug treatment

Millar, Tim; Hayhurst, Karen P.; Jones, Andrew; Davies, Linda; Weston, Samantha; Dunn, Graham; Donmall, Michael

doi:10.3109/09687637.2013.810707

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is likely to be mediated by reduced opioid tolerance , due to dose tapering and cessation of prescribing at discharge. The nature of residential treatment may vary across countries; as provided in the United Kingdom it is an intensive, non‐mandatory intervention received by patients who appear more amenable to treatment . Further, appropriately powered research is needed to contrast the DRP associated with discharge from in‐patient and residential rehabilitation services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of treatment for opioid dependence on fatal drug‐related poisoning: a national cohort study in England

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimsTo compare the change in illicit opioid users’ risk of fatal drug‐related poisoning (DRP) associated with opioid agonist pharmacotherapy (OAP) and psychological support, and investigate the modifying effect of patient characteristics, criminal justice system (CJS) referral and treatment completion.DesignNational data linkage cohort study of the English National Drug Treatment Monitoring System and the Office for National Statistics national mortality database. Data were analysed using survival methods.SettingAll services in England that provide publicly funded, structured treatment for illicit opioid users.ParticipantsAdults treated for opioid dependence during April 2005 to March 2009: 151 983 individuals; 69% male; median age 32.6 with 442 950 person‐years of observation.MeasurementsThe outcome was fatal DRP occurring during periods in or out of treatment, with adjustment for age, gender, substances used, injecting status and CJS referral.FindingsThere were 1499 DRP deaths [3.4 per 1000 person‐years, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.2–3.6]. DRP risk increased while patients were not enrolled in any treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.55–1.92]. Risk when enrolled only in a psychological intervention was double that during OAP (aHR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.75–2.46). The increased risk when out of treatment was greater for men (aHR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.67–2.12), illicit drug injectors (aHR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.97–2.62) and those reporting problematic alcohol use (aHR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.90–2.98).ConclusionsPatients who received only psychological support for opioid dependence in England appear to be at greater risk of fatal opioid poisoning than those who received opioid agonist pharmacotherapy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%