2011
DOI: 10.4103/0976-500x.81911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with performance of second year student in pharmacology examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jaykaran et al [10] reported a comparable academic performance of day scholar and hostel aid students which differ from the result of this study where day scholar students performed better than their colleagues with hostel aid. The reason for this difference though not investigated in this study could be because of the rural-urban background of students and the medium of instruction at their schools.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jaykaran et al [10] reported a comparable academic performance of day scholar and hostel aid students which differ from the result of this study where day scholar students performed better than their colleagues with hostel aid. The reason for this difference though not investigated in this study could be because of the rural-urban background of students and the medium of instruction at their schools.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Previous studies reported that high percentages of marks are secured by students who attend classes regularly compared to those who failed to do so. Jaykaran et al [10] in his study reported a moderate correlation between attendance and marks obtained in pharmacology by the Indian medical undergraduate students (Pearson correlation coeffi cient = 0.578, P = 0.00). BinSaeed et al, [11] also demonstrated that students without a history of absenteeism had a higher mean grade point average (GPA) in comparison with students with a history of absenteeism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation analysis is a good way to determine associations and was used in several (Hamdi, 2006;Jaykaran et al, 2011;Stegers-Jager et al, 2012;Demir et al, 2012;Al Khaja et al, 2019) but not all the studies (Khan et al, 2003;BinSaeed et al, 2009;Selvig et al, 2014;Popovic et al, 2018). Three studies showed moderate associations ( (Hamdi, 2006;Jaykaran et al, 2011;Stegers-Jager et al, 2012), one study showed moderate to weak associations (Al Khaja et al, 2019) and one study showed a weak association between lecture attendance and academic outcomes (Demir et al, 2012). In addition, one of the studies using correlation analysis was able to show that the students had better outcomes for the lectures they attended than for the ones they skipped, and that this was true for both the first-time and repeat takers (Demir et al, 2017).…”
Section: Positive Relationship Between Lecture Attendance and Academimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of reported availability of lecture recordings, a positive association was shown for 93% of courses (13 of 14 studies) versus one course (7%) not showing an association. There were 13 studies showing a positive association (Hamen & Kelland, 1994;Gatherer & Manning, 1998;Brown, Graham, Money, & Rakoczy, 1999;Grisé & Kenney, 2003;Khan, Khattak, Mahsud, Ali, Khan, Saleem, & Shah, 2003;Moore et al, 2003;Moore, 2006;Hamdi, 2006;Salamonson et al, 2009;BinSaeed et al, 2009;Jaykaran, Yadav, Chavda, & Kantharia, 2011;Stegers-Jager, Cohen-Schotanus, & Themmen, 2012;Demir, Tutuk, Dogan, Egeli, & Turner, 2017), and the one study not showing a positive association was that of Cohall and Skeete, 2012. In contrast, in the presence of lecture recordings, a positive association was shown in 58% of courses (7 of 12 courses) versus 42% of courses not showing a relationship between lecture attendance and academic outcomes. There were seven courses showing a positive association (Fernandes et al, 2008;Soto & Anand, 2009;Horton et al, 2012;Selvig et al, 2014;Popovic et al, 2018;Doggrell, 2018; and for one in four courses studied by Davis et al, 2012) and five courses not showing an association (Hidayat et al, 2012;Azab et al, 2016; and three courses studied by Davis et al, 2012).…”
Section: Lecture Attendance and Academic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%