Abstract:Background It is unclear what the exact short-term outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs), also known and necrotizing fasciitis of the upper extremity, are and whether these are comparable to other anatomical regions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess factors associated with mortality within 30-days and amputation in patients with upper extremity NSTIs. Methods A retrospective study over a 20-year time period of all patients treated for NSTIs of the upper extremity was carried out. … Show more
“…Patients with type I NSTIs usually have more and severe comorbidities (such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, chronic renal failure) ( 2 , 6 , 39 ). This could indicate that especially younger and healthier patients present with early systemic toxicity, while notable the older patients with severe and/or multiple comorbidities present with late systemic toxicity and have a higher risk of expiring ( 3 , 28 , 39 , 42 ). Therefore, the absence of systemic toxicity can be misleading, but should be kept in mind as diagnostic pitfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type I is polymicrobial and generally consists of various species of gram-positive cocci, gram-negative rods and anaerobes (2,10). Type II is monomicrobial with GAS being the most common microbe found (39,42). Recently an attempt was made to categorize specific strains of bacteria in their presentation, as Type III consists of more rare isolated 3) symptoms upon presentation.…”
Section: Causes Of Variation In Presentationmentioning
Background: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections (NSTIs) are uncommon rapidly spreading infection of the soft tissues for which prompt surgical treatment is vital for survival. Currently, even with sufficient awareness and facilities available, ambiguous symptoms frequently result in treatment delay.Objectives: To illustrate the heterogeneity in presentation of NSTIs and the pitfalls entailing from this heterogeneity.Discussion: NSTI symptoms appear on a spectrum with on one side the typical critically ill patient with fast onset and progression of symptoms combined with severe systemic toxicity resulting in severe physical derangement and sepsis. In these cases, the suspicion of a NSTI rises quickly. On the other far side of the spectrum is the less evident type of presentation of the patient with gradual but slow progression of non-specific symptoms over the past couple of days without clear signs of sepsis initially. This side of the spectrum is under represented in current literature and some physicians involved in the care for NSTI patients are still unaware of this heterogeneity in presentation.Conclusion: The presentation of a critically ill patient with evident pain out of proportion, erythema, necrotic skin and bullae is the classical presentation of NSTIs. On the other hand, non-specific symptoms without systemic toxicity at presentation frequently result in a battery of diagnostics tests and imaging before the treatment strategy is determined. This may result in a delay in presentation, delay in diagnosis and delay in definitive treatment. This failure to perform an adequate exploration expeditiously can result in a preventable mortality.
“…Patients with type I NSTIs usually have more and severe comorbidities (such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, chronic renal failure) ( 2 , 6 , 39 ). This could indicate that especially younger and healthier patients present with early systemic toxicity, while notable the older patients with severe and/or multiple comorbidities present with late systemic toxicity and have a higher risk of expiring ( 3 , 28 , 39 , 42 ). Therefore, the absence of systemic toxicity can be misleading, but should be kept in mind as diagnostic pitfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type I is polymicrobial and generally consists of various species of gram-positive cocci, gram-negative rods and anaerobes (2,10). Type II is monomicrobial with GAS being the most common microbe found (39,42). Recently an attempt was made to categorize specific strains of bacteria in their presentation, as Type III consists of more rare isolated 3) symptoms upon presentation.…”
Section: Causes Of Variation In Presentationmentioning
Background: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections (NSTIs) are uncommon rapidly spreading infection of the soft tissues for which prompt surgical treatment is vital for survival. Currently, even with sufficient awareness and facilities available, ambiguous symptoms frequently result in treatment delay.Objectives: To illustrate the heterogeneity in presentation of NSTIs and the pitfalls entailing from this heterogeneity.Discussion: NSTI symptoms appear on a spectrum with on one side the typical critically ill patient with fast onset and progression of symptoms combined with severe systemic toxicity resulting in severe physical derangement and sepsis. In these cases, the suspicion of a NSTI rises quickly. On the other far side of the spectrum is the less evident type of presentation of the patient with gradual but slow progression of non-specific symptoms over the past couple of days without clear signs of sepsis initially. This side of the spectrum is under represented in current literature and some physicians involved in the care for NSTI patients are still unaware of this heterogeneity in presentation.Conclusion: The presentation of a critically ill patient with evident pain out of proportion, erythema, necrotic skin and bullae is the classical presentation of NSTIs. On the other hand, non-specific symptoms without systemic toxicity at presentation frequently result in a battery of diagnostics tests and imaging before the treatment strategy is determined. This may result in a delay in presentation, delay in diagnosis and delay in definitive treatment. This failure to perform an adequate exploration expeditiously can result in a preventable mortality.
“…In upper extremity preexisting comorbidities and patients presenting with septic symptoms had a greater risk of dying [80,81] . Indeed, a higher ASA classification and base deficit at admission have been linked to higher mortality [82] . In lower limb, the factors associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality are age >60 years, PTT >38 seconds, serum albumin <2.0 mg/dL, coagulopathy, ASA class IV-V, COPD, postoperative ARDS, and postoperative septic shock [83] .…”
We report in the light of a literature review the results of 28 patients treated for Necrotizing Fasciitis (NF) at the extremities between 2012 and 2017 with a view to a prospective study with longer following up and a greater number of patients.
“…There are similar criteria for specific infections such as flexor tenosynovitis 29 and necrotizing fasciitis. 30 , 31 These criteria enable hand surgeons to identify patients with a poor prognosis, particularly in the setting of an established COVID infection, and early amputation may be considered rather than attempting repeated efforts at digit or limb salvage. In the current setting where operating room resources are limited, we drain localized infections (eg, paronychia) in the ward or an ambulatory facility.…”
Section: Specific Technical Considerationsmentioning
The case spectrum in hand surgery is one of extremes—purely elective day surgery cases under local anesthesia to mangling limb injuries that require immediate, and frequently, lengthy, surgery. Despite the cancellation of most elective orthopedic and plastic surgical procedures, hand surgeons around the world continue to see a steady stream of limb-threatening cases such as severe trauma and infections that require emergent surgical care. With the increase in community-spread, an increasing number of COVID-19–infected patients may be asymptomatic or have mild, nonspecific or atypical symptoms. Some of them may already have an ongoing, severe infection. The time-sensitive nature of some of these cases means that hand surgeons may need to operate urgently on patients who may be suspected of COVID-19 infections, often before confirmatory test results are available. General guidelines for perioperative care of the COVID-19–positive patient have been published. However, our practices differ from those of general orthopedic and plastic surgery, primarily because of the focus on trauma. This article discusses the perioperative and technical considerations that are essential to manage the COVID-19 patient requiring emergency care, without compromising clinical outcomes and while ensuring the safety of the attending staff.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.