Abstract:Research related to mental health service use among vulnerable young adults is limited. This study used an expanded version of Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use to evaluate factors associated with the use of different types of mental health services among a sample of predominantly African-American 16-24 year olds (n = 500) in an employment training program in Baltimore City. Results indicated that participants were more likely to have received mental health services in correctional facilities … Show more
“…Regarding perceived need, participants in clinical samples who reported a need for mental health support were almost five times more likely to access services than those who perceived no need for professional help (61,63). This significant relationship was also found in a nonclinical sample (65).…”
Section: Predisposing Enabling and Need Variablessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Psychological distress (as measured by Adult Self-Report and the DSM-IV) was the only significant predictor for the clinical group (63,64), whereas depression (as measured by Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] and Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), anxiety (as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory and PHQ-9), and psychological distress (as measured by the dysphoria domain of the Trauma Symptom Inventory) were each significant predictors of service use among the general (nonclinical) young adult population (26,43,51,60,65). Notably, probable diagnoses of depression (based on CES-D screening) significantly increased the odds of service use in the longer term among the nonclinical group (Table 2).…”
Section: Predisposing Enabling and Need Variablesmentioning
Objective: The purpose of this review was to systematically evaluate the available heterogeneous research examining determinants of mental health service use among young adults.Methods: Nine electronic databases were searched to identify quantitative studies examining sociodemographic and psychological variables predictive of or associated with mental health service use. Included studies were examined against the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Effect size estimates in the form of odds ratios were calculated and classified according to predisposing, enabling, and need factors, consistent with Andersen's behavioral model of health care.Results: Eighteen studies met all of the inclusion criteria (N=96,297 participants). Studies generally followed the STROBE recommendations for external validity, although limitations in internal validity were noted. Prior service contact and being homosexual or bisexual, female, or Caucasian were predisposing factors significantly associated with mental health service use. Social support was the single enabling factor identified, although this finding was based on limited data. In relation to need, young adults who reported higher perceived need for professional help or more mental health difficulties were more likely to have utilized services.Conclusions: This review identified subgroups of young adults who are less likely to access mental health support. Future research should focus on developing psychoeducational interventions targeted at young men and racial-ethnic minority groups, in addition to informing young adults of the success of mental health counseling in the absence of a diagnosis.
“…Regarding perceived need, participants in clinical samples who reported a need for mental health support were almost five times more likely to access services than those who perceived no need for professional help (61,63). This significant relationship was also found in a nonclinical sample (65).…”
Section: Predisposing Enabling and Need Variablessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Psychological distress (as measured by Adult Self-Report and the DSM-IV) was the only significant predictor for the clinical group (63,64), whereas depression (as measured by Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] and Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), anxiety (as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory and PHQ-9), and psychological distress (as measured by the dysphoria domain of the Trauma Symptom Inventory) were each significant predictors of service use among the general (nonclinical) young adult population (26,43,51,60,65). Notably, probable diagnoses of depression (based on CES-D screening) significantly increased the odds of service use in the longer term among the nonclinical group (Table 2).…”
Section: Predisposing Enabling and Need Variablesmentioning
Objective: The purpose of this review was to systematically evaluate the available heterogeneous research examining determinants of mental health service use among young adults.Methods: Nine electronic databases were searched to identify quantitative studies examining sociodemographic and psychological variables predictive of or associated with mental health service use. Included studies were examined against the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Effect size estimates in the form of odds ratios were calculated and classified according to predisposing, enabling, and need factors, consistent with Andersen's behavioral model of health care.Results: Eighteen studies met all of the inclusion criteria (N=96,297 participants). Studies generally followed the STROBE recommendations for external validity, although limitations in internal validity were noted. Prior service contact and being homosexual or bisexual, female, or Caucasian were predisposing factors significantly associated with mental health service use. Social support was the single enabling factor identified, although this finding was based on limited data. In relation to need, young adults who reported higher perceived need for professional help or more mental health difficulties were more likely to have utilized services.Conclusions: This review identified subgroups of young adults who are less likely to access mental health support. Future research should focus on developing psychoeducational interventions targeted at young men and racial-ethnic minority groups, in addition to informing young adults of the success of mental health counseling in the absence of a diagnosis.
“…Of the studies identifying a conceptual model when measuring adolescents' utilization of health services, ABM was the most frequently used model (Adams, Newacheck, Park, Brindis, & Irwin, 2013;Marcell et al, 2007;Maulik, Mendelson, & Tandon, 2011;Wu, Blazer, Li, & Woody, 2011;Wu, Pilowsky, Schlenger, & Hasin, 2007). Additional studies appear to have been organized according to ABM, but did not specify the conceptual model used (McKee, Fletcher, & Schechter, 2006;Youngblade, Curry, Novak, Vogel, & Shenkman, 2006).…”
Section: Application Of Andersen's Behavioral Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When polling adolescents , USOC rates drop to 63% among Hispanics in Connecticut (Rew et al, 1999), 64% of rural minority high school students in Mississippi (Bradford & O'Sullivan, 2006), 75.8% of African-American adolescent males in Maryland (Maulik et al, 2011), 80% among minority adolescent females in New York, and 81% of adolescent CHIP recipients in Florida and New York. These results seem to indicate that low income and minority adolescents are less likely to report a USOC than reported by parents of American adolescents in general.…”
Section: Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health care provider visits and emergency room visits were measured individually. A review of other studies measuring utilization of health services among adolescents indicated that 12 months was the most frequent timeframe used (Berdahl et al, 2013;Klein et al, 2006;Maulik et al, 2011;Mulye et al, 2009;Probst et al, 2005;Rew et al, 1999;Simpson et al, 2005;Simpson et al, 2004;Wu et al, 2007). Other timeframes used to evaluate utilization of health services were a three-month timeframe (Bradford & O'Sullivan, 2006, 2007 and a twoyear timeframe (Elliott & Larson, 2004).…”
Section: Stanford Health Care Utilization Questionnairementioning
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWhile my name appears on the cover of this dissertation, several people have contributed significantly to its completion. As with all dissertations, this process was a long process and the result of the guidance, support, and friendship of several individuals.I am grateful to all those who have helped me finish this project.
Using General Strain Theory, this study investigates the effects of vicarious trauma exposure and perceived social support on nonmedical codeine syrup misuse among Black incarcerated men nearing community re‐entry. Data were drawn from the Helping Incarcerated Men project, a study examining mental health, substance misuse, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviors among Black men living in prisons who were within 180 days of release. A total of 200 Black men self‐reported demographics (i.e., age and length of incarceration after age 18), vicarious trauma exposure (e.g., ever witnessing an assault with a weapon and a sudden accidental death), perceived social support, and nonmedical codeine syrup misuse. Findings from the logistic regression analysis showed witnessing an assault with a weapon and a sudden accidental death increased the likelihood of codeine syrup misuse. Perceived social support was not associated with codeine syrup misuse. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.