Factors Associated with Medical Doctors' Intentions to Discriminate Against Transgender Patients in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Purpose: Transgender people are frequent targets of discrimination. Discrimination against transgender people in the context of healthcare can lead to poor health outcomes and facilitate the growth of health disparities. This study explores factors associated with medical doctors' intentions to discriminate against transgender people in Malaysia. Methods: A total of 436 physicians at two major university medical centers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, completed an online survey. Sociodemographic characteristics, stigma-related constructs, and intentions to discriminate against transgender people were measured. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression were used to evaluate independent covariates of discrimination intent. Results: Medical doctors who felt more fearful of transgender people and more personal shame associated with transgender people expressed greater intention to discriminate against transgender people, whereas doctors who endorsed the belief that transgender people deserve good care reported lower discrimination intent. Stigma-related constructs accounted for 42% of the variance and 8% was accounted for by sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusions: Constructs associated with transgender stigma play an important role in medical doctors' intentions to discriminate against transgender patients. Development of interventions to improve medical doctors' knowledge about and attitudes toward transgender people are necessary to reduce discriminatory intent in healthcare settings.

Nurses' attitudes and emotions toward caring for adults with intellectual disabilities: Results of a cross‐sectional, correlational‐predictive research study

“…Despite this, little research exists that examines healthcare providers' attitudes toward adults with intellectual disabilities and the effects of those attitudes on the care of people with intellectual disabilities. Research findings on healthcare providers' attitudes about other vulnerable patient populations support the impact of negative healthcare provider attitudes on the patient–provider relationship (Chu & Galang, ; Hall et al, ; Parkinson, ), healthcare provider clinical decision‐making (Earnshaw et al, ; Vijay et al, ) and patient care seeking behaviours (Drainoni et al, ; van Loon, Knibbe, & Van Hove, ). However, these studies have not included adults with intellectual disabilities.…”

Nurses' attitudes, beliefs, and emotions toward caring for adults with intellectual disabilities: An integrative review

“…Despite multiple national reports calling attention to negative health‐care provider attitudes toward adults with ID in the United States, little research is found that examines how exactly health‐care providers' attitudes affect the care of people with disabilities in the present day. Research findings on health‐care providers' attitudes across vulnerable patient groups support the impact of negative health‐care provider attitudes on the patient‐provider relationship, health‐care provider clinical decision‐making, and patient care‐seeking behaviors . Only slightly over a decade ago, adults with disabilities described their perceptions of discriminatory health‐care provider attitudes and behaviors, including an unwillingness on the part of health‐care providers to adapt clinical routines to meet the needs of the person with a disability, the withholding of care or provision of inferior care, the separation of people with disabilities away from general patient areas, and insensitive provider communication with people with disabilities .…”

Similar, but different: drivers of the disproportionate HIV and sexually transmitted infection burden of key populations

“…Although members of KP sub-groups may have different patterns of behaviour and social mixing that influence their HIV/STI risks, their vulnerabilities are augmented by common factors (Table 1). Often, KP experience structural barriers and societal discrimination that may increase their HIV/STI vulnerability by encumbering their access to healthcare [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Moreover, structural factors may not only directly affect susceptibility (e.g.…”