2002
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population‐based sample of New Hampshire women

Abstract: BACKGROUNDInterval adherence to mammography screening continues to be lower than experts advise. The authors evaluated, using a population‐based mammography registry, factors associated with adherence to recommended mammography screening intervals.METHODSThe authors identified and recruited 625 women aged 50 years and older who did and did not adhere to interval mammography screening. Demographic and risk characteristics were ascertained from the registry and were supplemented with responses on a mailed survey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
41
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(9 reference statements)
3
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that women's knowledge about disease risk, their incomes, race, and relations with their primary care physicians, and their worries correlate with participation in mammography screening. [14] The results of a community-based mammography screening program performed in Spain [15] and Colorado [16] showed that the possibility of not undergoing mammography was higher in elderly women, which is similar to our findings. A study performed in Sweden showed that married and more educated women had higher participation rates than single, widowed or divorced and lower educated women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that women's knowledge about disease risk, their incomes, race, and relations with their primary care physicians, and their worries correlate with participation in mammography screening. [14] The results of a community-based mammography screening program performed in Spain [15] and Colorado [16] showed that the possibility of not undergoing mammography was higher in elderly women, which is similar to our findings. A study performed in Sweden showed that married and more educated women had higher participation rates than single, widowed or divorced and lower educated women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[17] Another study performed by Augustson et al [18] reported that women with at least a high school education were more likely to be adherent to mammography screening. Carney et al [14] reported that those with social security, women with cancer in their first-degree relatives, and those undergoing hormone replacement treatments participated in the screening more frequently than did women who did not have these characteristics. According to our results and the other studies listed above, age and educational status seem the most influential factors affecting participation in the mammography screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a parent study of this current paper on Chinese women in China, the rates of regular mammographic screening varied between regions from 4.8-28.8% (Kim et al, 2011). Previous studies explained sociocultural and individual beliefs and perceptions to be associated with mammography adherence (Carney et al, 2002;Chua et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2010). For example, as reported in the study by Wang et al (2009) Chinese women were less interested in going for a mammography because the traditional method of cancer prevention promotes maintaining a balanced diet, using herbs, and exercising as the best approach (Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Factors Associated With Mammography Adherence Among Married mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Besides participants' knowledge of cancer risk, barriers such as fear of embarrassment or pain have been associated with the attendance of screening (Carney et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2011). Perceived benefits and barriers have an important role towards the change in behaviors and is a key predictor of cancer prevention practices (Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Andersen, 2000;Augustson, 2003;Barr, 2001;Bobo, 2004;Calvoressi, 2004;Carney, 2002;Crane, 1998;Fox, 1998;Gilliland, 2000;Partin, 2005;Song, 1998;Ulcickas-Yood, 1999;] Studies report higher adherence when they use less stringent definitions of repeat screening (e.g., second screen within 30 months versus second screen within 24 months) or comprise women with a history of prior screening. [Clark, 2003] Measures of regular screening are more difficult to compare because of larger variations between definitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%