2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-017-1015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with good self-rated health in European adolescents: a population-based cross-sectional study

Abstract: Our findings suggest strong associations between social and lifestyle factors and self-rated health. Other explanatory variables will require future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies observed a dose-response relationship between PA and SRH, where an increasing level or amount of PA was related to a higher odds of “good or excellent” SRH (see Additional file 3 ) [ 1 , 4 , 27 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 48 , 54 , 60 , 68 , 70 , 86 ]. For example, the study by Lachytova et al (2017) found in a sample of adolescents aged 14–16 years old that relative to students who exercised less than once a week, students who exercised every day were 8.04 times more likely to report “good and excellent” health; students who exercised 4–6 times a week and 2–3 times a week were 3.67 times and 1.35 times, respectively, more likely than those exercised less than once a week to have “good and excellent” health after adjusting for gender, BMI, mental health and sedentary behaviour in the logistic regression [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of studies observed a dose-response relationship between PA and SRH, where an increasing level or amount of PA was related to a higher odds of “good or excellent” SRH (see Additional file 3 ) [ 1 , 4 , 27 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 48 , 54 , 60 , 68 , 70 , 86 ]. For example, the study by Lachytova et al (2017) found in a sample of adolescents aged 14–16 years old that relative to students who exercised less than once a week, students who exercised every day were 8.04 times more likely to report “good and excellent” health; students who exercised 4–6 times a week and 2–3 times a week were 3.67 times and 1.35 times, respectively, more likely than those exercised less than once a week to have “good and excellent” health after adjusting for gender, BMI, mental health and sedentary behaviour in the logistic regression [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies used other statistical methods, such as linear regression, t-test or ANOVA and were not included in the meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in statistics and small number of studies. Regarding the effect of PA, several studies used lower SRH as a reference group (e.g., coded as “good/excellent” versus “poor/fair” health) with more than two levels of PA in the logistic regression and were not included in the meta-analysis due to the difference in the grouping of PA (e.g., PA as clusters or days/week) [ 4 , 27 , 42 , 45 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings here have implications for policy and research, particularly regarding racial and ethnic disparities in SRH in youths [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ]. Policies should target structural barriers that systematically hold Blacks back.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The answers were binarized into “high” (strongly agree and agree) and “low” (neither agree nor disagree, disagree, and strongly disagree) social capital [49]. These items have been previously used in the studies examining relationships of social capital and physical activity among adolescents of Turkey [40] and Croatia [42], examining relationships of social capital and self-rated health among adolescents in Serbia [50] and Lithuania [51] and in combined sample of European adolescents [52].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%