2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among residents of Northern California jails

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent studies have found similar findings that incarcerated individuals’ COVID-19 vaccination acceptance is not solely based on one factor and that a myriad of things unique to carceral settings affect uptake. [ [15] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] ] Many of these themes (e.g. lack of trust and safety concerns) are consistent with vaccine hesitancy among non-incarcerated Black and Latinx communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have found similar findings that incarcerated individuals’ COVID-19 vaccination acceptance is not solely based on one factor and that a myriad of things unique to carceral settings affect uptake. [ [15] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] ] Many of these themes (e.g. lack of trust and safety concerns) are consistent with vaccine hesitancy among non-incarcerated Black and Latinx communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no studies that have allowed us to assess the magnitude of the phenomenon and the exact causes. Individual studies indicate that the most common cause of refusals is fear of side effects [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, regarding limited access to testing, we found that even among residents who reported their flu-like illness to jail staff, only 62% said they were then tested for COVID-19, and 22% said no action was taken. Relatedly, many residents believed that their health concerns were neglected by jail staff; this belief may reflect institutional or medical mistrust that could impede care-seeking or uptake of other preventive measures like vaccination, as has been shown in other studies ( 39 , 46 , 60 ). In particular, residents who were neutral or in disagreement about jail health staff taking their health concerns seriously had increased odds of antibody positivity; however, we were unable to infer causality or to determine the direction of causation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For all seroprevalence analyses, we excluded 82 incarcerated participants and 77 staff participants who were vaccinated prior to enrollment, based on self-reported vaccination status and/or Correctional Health data on vaccine uptake in custody, accessed as previously described ( 39 ). We calculated 95% confidence intervals for seroprevalence using the Wilson method for binomial data ( 57 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation