Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic; a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Abstract

Background A high COVID-19 vaccine uptake is essential to achieve herd immunity to combat the current strain of COVID-19 and potential future variants. This review aimed to identify factors associated with public intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines until February 2021 to provide accessible data to policymakers to inform framing and targeting of messages designed to optimise vaccine uptake. Methods Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Sociological Abstracts and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts were searched for cross-sectional studies reporting data regarding COVID-19 vaccine intentions, published between 01/01/2020 and 12/02/2021. Title/abstract and full-text screening were performed independently by two authors. The Appraisal Tool for Cross-sectional Studies (AXIS) was used to assess bias and quality. Both random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis were used to describe vaccine intentions and associated factors. A subgroup analysis assessing the impact of sex, sampling method and time of survey on COVID-19 vaccine intention was performed. Results Searches identified 4739 studies, and 23 cross-sectional studies were deemed eligible for the review; 22 used online surveys and one used a mixed-methods study design. Eighteen surveys were conducted in the first half of 2020 and five were conducted in the latter half of 2020. Fifteen countries were represented, with the most common being the United States (n = 4) and the United Kingdom (n = 4) sampling 41,403 participants across all surveys. Most studies employed convenience sampling and 11 non-responder rates raised concerns over non-response bias. From the 18 studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled proportion of survey participants willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine was 73.3% (n = 18, 95% Confidence Interval 64.2 to 81.5%, I2 = 99.7%). Factors associated with a higher COVID-19 vaccine acceptance included greater perceived risk of COVID-19, lower level of perceived vaccine harm, higher educational attainment and household income, older age, being of White ethnicity and male sex. Conclusions There was a high willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine which was influenced by sociodemographic factors and risk perceptions. The findings suggest future research should explore reasoning behind vaccine intentions for different sociodemographic groups to allow targeted communication strategies to be formulated by public health agencies. Registration PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021239134.

The impact of seasonal influenza vaccination uptake on COVID-19 vaccination attitudes in a rural area in Greece

“…Previous studies have shown an association between previous influenza vaccination and COVID-19 vaccine willingness and/or acceptance [6] , [7] . Our findings add to the literature, by confirming the association between influenza vaccination and vaccination for COVID-19.…”

Estimating COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its drivers among migrants, homeless and precariously housed people in France

“…COVID-19 vaccine mandates are not well studied in the literature, but they were shown to be positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the general population of Hong Kong and in the ethnic minorities in the Netherlands 32 , 36 . Recent studies have since questioned the impact of such policies in the long term 42 , 43 . Thus, differences in vaccine uptake between strata cannot be solely explained by the introduction of certificates.…”

Understanding the challenges to COVID-19 vaccines and treatment options, herd immunity and probability of reinfection

“… 80 , 81 Furthermore, several research groups have aimed to assess the determinants of, and factors driving, vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. 82 , 83 Notably, many COVID-19 vaccine-associated studies have focused on healthcare workers (HCWs) in the early stages of the pandemic, because many countries prioritized vaccination of HCWs at the frontline of the pandemic response, who helped safeguard the lives of vulnerable populations. 84 …”