2023
DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed8030133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Associated with COVID-19 Death in a High-Altitude Peruvian Setting during the First 14 Months of the Pandemic: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Hospitalized Patients

Abstract: Risk factors for COVID-19 death in high-altitude populations have been scarcely described. This study aimed to describe risk factors for COVID-19 death in three referral hospitals located at 3399 m in Cusco, Peru, during the first 14 months of the pandemic. A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted. A random sample of ~50% (1225/2674) of adult hospitalized patients who died between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2021 was identified. Of those, 977 individuals met the definition of death by COVID-19. Demo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their part, the PO 2 S values we reported in our study (74.9%) were closer to an investigation where patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at altitude with a PO 2 S of 75-79% and ≤75% had 2.92 (1.99, 4.3) and 2.79 (1.89, 4.11) (both p < 0.001) higher risk of ICU admission or death, respectively, compared to patients with PO 2 S ≥ 85% [3]. Somehow, the literature confirmed these postulates by stating that patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in ICU at high altitudes (3339 MASL) with higher oxygen respiratory rates had lower odds of mortality [17]. Patients hospitalized at low altitudes with a PO 2 S ≤ 90% were 47 times more likely to die due to COVID-19 than those with a PO 2 S > 90% (p < 0.001) [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For their part, the PO 2 S values we reported in our study (74.9%) were closer to an investigation where patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at altitude with a PO 2 S of 75-79% and ≤75% had 2.92 (1.99, 4.3) and 2.79 (1.89, 4.11) (both p < 0.001) higher risk of ICU admission or death, respectively, compared to patients with PO 2 S ≥ 85% [3]. Somehow, the literature confirmed these postulates by stating that patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in ICU at high altitudes (3339 MASL) with higher oxygen respiratory rates had lower odds of mortality [17]. Patients hospitalized at low altitudes with a PO 2 S ≤ 90% were 47 times more likely to die due to COVID-19 than those with a PO 2 S > 90% (p < 0.001) [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Además, a mayores altitudes, la presión (32) parcial de oxígeno en el aire disminuye, lo que puede comprometer aún más la capacidad de oxigenación en pacientes con COVID-19, especialmente aquellos con comorbilidades respiratorias o cardiovasculares preexistentes . La siopatología de la adaptación a la (33) altitud también puede in uir en la respuesta in amatoria y en la coagulación sanguínea, factores críticos en el curso clínico de COVID-19.…”
Section: Pg 95unclassified