2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with cognitive impairment in a cohort of older homeless adults: Results from the HOPE HOME study

Abstract: Background We evaluated cognitive function and factors associated with cognitive impairment in a cohort of older homeless adults. We hypothesized that substance use and a history of traumatic brain injury would be associated with cognitive impairment. Methods We recruited 350 homeless individuals aged ≥50 years using population-based sampling and conducted structured interviews and neuropsychological testing. We evaluated alcohol use with the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, defining high-severity a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(105 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies mostly ( n = 29) recruited from homeless populations, with definitions of homelessness ranging from absolute homelessness to recently rehoused, or in unsecure or unsuitable accommodation. Additional sample criterion included veteran status (Barnes et al, ; Brenner et al, ) and older age (Brown et al, ; Brown, Kiely, Bharel, & Mitchell, ; Hurstak et al, ; Joyce & Limbos, ; Okamura et al, ). Of studies which did not sample from homeless populations, two recruited from prisons (Hennessey, Stein, Rosengard, Rose, & Clarke, ; McCarthy et al, ), and other sampling frames included professionals who worked with the homeless (Colman, Hebblethwaite, Hames, Forsyth, & Donkin, ), mental health service clients (Keyser & Mathiesen, ), and records of hospital admissions (McMillan et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Empirical studies mostly ( n = 29) recruited from homeless populations, with definitions of homelessness ranging from absolute homelessness to recently rehoused, or in unsecure or unsuitable accommodation. Additional sample criterion included veteran status (Barnes et al, ; Brenner et al, ) and older age (Brown et al, ; Brown, Kiely, Bharel, & Mitchell, ; Hurstak et al, ; Joyce & Limbos, ; Okamura et al, ). Of studies which did not sample from homeless populations, two recruited from prisons (Hennessey, Stein, Rosengard, Rose, & Clarke, ; McCarthy et al, ), and other sampling frames included professionals who worked with the homeless (Colman, Hebblethwaite, Hames, Forsyth, & Donkin, ), mental health service clients (Keyser & Mathiesen, ), and records of hospital admissions (McMillan et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers reported on the same project or sample. These papers are at times reported on independently due to differences in sample type (Colman et al, ; Hebblethwaite, Colman, Hames, Forsyth, & Donkin, ) and measures or methodology employed (Barnes et al, ; Brenner et al, ; Brown et al, ; Hurstak et al, ; Pluck et al, ; Van Straaten et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations